ArticleActa chirurgiae orthopaedicae et traumatologiae Cechoslovaca2026
[Usability of Ultrasonography in the Diagnosis of Pediatric Fractures].
Article in Acta chirurgiae orthopaedicae et traumatologiae Cechoslovaca, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
The study aims to evaluate the usability of ultrasonography in the diagnosis of pediatric fractures. Ultrasound examination of patients with fractures diagnosed using radiography at the Clinic of Pediatric and Trauma Surgery, Third Faculty of Medicine, Charles University and UTH between 27 May 2024 and 31 December 2024. We identified a total of 11 areas to be examined - clavicle, proximal humerus, elbow, forearm, metacarpal bones, fingers of the upper limb, sternum, femur, tibia, ankle, and metatarsal bones. The examination was performed independently by a surgeon and a radiologist, who selected the patients randomly during their treatment at the clinic. The entire bone was examined by ultrasound in all available projections, and signs of skeletal trauma (cortical bumping, cortical disruption, offset of bone fragments, chimney effect, or indirect signs such as joint effusion) were sought. A total of 61 patients were examined, of whom 24 girls (39%) and 37 boys (61%). The mean age of patients was 10 years (1-17 years). The overall agreement between ultrasound and radiologic examinations is 94%. Ultrasonography failed to visualize two fractures, namely a nondisplaced SH type II fracture of the distal fibula epiphysis and a nondisplaced SH type III fracture of the distal phalanx epiphysis. Two suspected fractures of the distal forearm detected by radiography were not observed by ultrasonography. The fracture was ruled out by a follow-up radiography, and the sonographic finding was found to be correct. Ultrasonography is a usable diagnostic method for skeletal trauma. The estimated sensitivity of this examination is around 97%. Our results indicate greater specificity of ultrasound in the forearm region. In agreement with literature, ultrasound can be considered usable for the diagnosis of fractures in all examined areas. In certain locations, it can also be used to measure displacement. The weak point of the study is the limited number of patients, therefore further investigation into these matters is necessary. Ultrasonography appears to be a useful screening method for skeletal trauma in children, serving as a basis for indication for radiography. This could help reduce the number of radiologic examinations performed by up to two-thirds, thereby reducing the radiation exposure in pediatric patients. Further research on these matters is needed, and diagnostic reliability indicators shall be defined. In the phase two of the study, we plan to determine the sensitivity, specificity, positive and negative predictive values for all anatomical regions. The secondary objective is to evaluate the results achieved by the surgeon and the radiologist, the painfulness of the examination, and the usability of portable ultrasound devices.
Indexed as
Identifiers
41854483What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.