Evidence map›Paper›PMID 41854366›Full record

ArticleInternational journal of social determinants of health and health services2026

Doctors' Conflict-of-Interest; What it Looks Like and What to do About it.

Joel Lexchin

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in International journal of social determinants of health and health services, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

1 author.

Joel LexchinSchool of Health Policy and Management, York University, Toronto, Canada.ORCID 0000-0001-5120-8029

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Conflict-of-interest (COI) between doctors and the pharmaceutical industry is widespread and is present in the majority of practitioners. The effects of COI on how doctors prescribe and hence on the health of their patients is negative. This article first summarizes the widespread nature of COI and then examines what forms it takes and how doctors view COI. It next looks at the two ways that have been used to try and limit its influence - managing COI and avoiding COI - and shows that managing COI by limiting gifts to small amounts and relying on declaring COI are based on false assumptions and have little chance of producing any positive results. It then goes on to review the measures that have been shown to be beneficial, particularly policies and legislation restricting or prohibiting certain types of COI among medical students, residents and practicing doctors. Finally, this article looks at how to build upon the successes that have occurred and what more could be done.

Indexed as

Conflict of InterestDisclosureDrug IndustryPhysiciansHumansconflict-of-interestdisclosuredoctorsgiftspharmaceutical companiespoliciesrestrictions

Identifiers

PMID41854366
PMCPMC13646402

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.