Evidence map›Paper›PMID 41854346›Full record

ArticleMedical mycology2026

Co-variation between blood stream infections with Candida species versus Pseudomonas aeruginosa, Staphylococcus aureus, and other isolates among 60 ICU patient cohorts.

James C Hurley

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Medical mycology, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

1 author.

James C HurleyMelbourne Medical School, University of Melbourne, Parkville, 3052, Australia.ORCID 0000-0002-5885-2084

Funding

Australian Government Department of Health
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundStaphylococcus aureus, Pseudomonas aeruginosa, Enterococcal species, Coagulase-negative Staphylococci, Acinetobacter species, and Candida species are common blood stream infection (BSI) isolates among intensive care unit (ICU) cohorts. That Candida species might interact with bacteria at mucosal surfaces to facilitate invasive infections prompts the question as to the degree of co-variance between Candida species versus bacteria among BSI isolates.

objectivesTo estimate the co-variance between Candida species versus each of these five bacteria as BSI isolates among ICU patient cohorts.

methodsThe literature was searched opportunistically for studies reporting ICU patient cohorts listing Candida species among BSI isolates. The associations of the BSI incidence proportion per 100 patients were converted to logits and modelled using ellipse plots.

resultsThe median overall BSI incidence proportion was 7.8% (interquartile range; 4.8%-11.6%). Among 60 cohorts (50 publications), correlation with the incidence proportion of Candidemia was apparent for Acinetobacter species (correlation coefficient = 0.69), Staphylococcus aureus (0.47), and Pseudomonas aeruginosa (0.4) but less so for Coagulase-negative Staphylococci (0.37) and Enterococcal species (0.32).

conclusionsThere are various degrees of co-variance between the BSI incidence proportion amongst the five types of bacteria and Candida species among ICU cohorts.

Indexed as

BacteremiaCandidaPseudomonas aeruginosaStaphylococcus aureusCohort StudiesHumansIncidenceIntensive Care UnitsStaphylococcal InfectionsAcinetobacter speciesblood stream infectionCandida speciesCoagulase-negative StaphylococciEnterococcal speciesintensive care unitmechanical ventilationobservational cohortPseudomonas aeruginosaStaphylococcus aureus

Identifiers

PMID41854346
PMCPMC13037462

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.