Evidence map›Paper›PMID 41854267›Full record

ArticlemSystems2026

Large-scale estimation of bacterial and archaeal DNA prevalence in metagenomes reveals biome-specific patterns.

Raphael Eisenhofer, Antton Alberdi, Ben J Woodcroft

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in mSystems, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 6 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
6citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

6 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors.

Raphael Eisenhofer *Center for Evolutionary Hologenomics, Globe Institute, University of Copenhagen, Copenhagen, Denmark.ORCID 0000-0002-3843-0749
Antton AlberdiCenter for Evolutionary Hologenomics, Globe Institute, University of Copenhagen, Copenhagen, Denmark.ORCID 0000-0002-2875-6446
Ben J Woodcroft *Centre for Microbiome Research, School of Biomedical Sciences, Queensland University of Technology (QUT), Translational Research Institute, Woolloongabba, Queensland, Australia.ORCID 0000-0003-0670-7480

Funding

Carlsbergfondet CF20-0460Danmarks Grundforskningsfond DNRF143Department of Education and Training DP230101171Department of Education and Training FT210100521
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Metagenomes often contain many reads derived from eukaryotes, but there is usually no reliable method for estimating their prevalence. This forces many analysis techniques to make the often-faulty assumption that all reads are prokaryotic. Here, we present SingleM prokaryotic_fraction (SPF), an algorithm that scalably and robustly estimates the number of bacterial and archaeal reads in a metagenome. It also estimates the average genome size of bacteria/archaea in a sample. SPF does not use eukaryotic reference genome data and can be applied to any modern Illumina metagenome. Based on SPF, we propose the domain-adjusted mapping rate (DAMR) as an improved metric to assess prokaryotic genome recovery from metagenomes. Applying SPF to 136,284 publicly available metagenomes, we report substantial variation in prokaryotic fractions and biome-specific patterns of prokaryotic abundance, providing insights into how microorganisms and eukaryotes are distributed across Earth. Finally, we show that substantial amounts of human host DNA sequence data have been deposited in public metagenome repositories, possibly counter to ethical directives that mandate screening of these reads prior to release. As the adoption of metagenomic sequencing continues to grow, we foresee SPF being a valuable tool for the appraisal of genome recovery efforts and for investigating global patterns of microorganism distribution.IMPORTANCEMetagenomics data sets capture DNA from all organisms in a sample, enabling the analysis of communities without relying on culture-based techniques. However, many samples include uncharacterized eukaryotic organisms and viral elements, meaning the proportion of bacterial and archaeal DNA is often unknown. This study presents SingleM prokaryotic_fraction (SPF), a robust and scalable method for estimating the prevalence of bacterial and archaeal DNA in metagenomes. Crucially, SPF is calculated independent of eukaryotic and viral reference genomes, which are often incomplete or unavailable. Applying SPF to over 136,000 public metagenomes uncovered substantial variability between microbial communities living in different environments. SPF also identified previously overlooked human genetic data contamination in public data sets, raising important ethical and privacy considerations. Building on SPF, we propose the domain-adjusted mapping rate (DAMR) metric, a new metric that improves genome recovery assessment by accounting for non-prokaryotic reads.

Indexed as

ArchaeaBacteriaDNA, ArchaealDNA, BacterialMetagenomeMetagenomicsAlgorithmsGenome, ArchaealHumansDNA, ArchaealDNA, Bacterialeukaryotic contaminationgenome recoverymetagenome

Identifiers

PMID41854267
PMCPMC13098197

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.