Evidence map›Paper›PMID 41854229›Full record

ArticleJournal of chemical theory and computation2026

PNcsp+: A Periodic Number-Based Crystal Structure Prediction Method Enhanced by Machine Learning.

Cem Oran, Riccarda Caputo, Pierre Villars, Adem Tekin

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Journal of chemical theory and computation, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors.

Cem OranInformatics Institute, Istanbul Technical University, Istanbul 34469, Türkiye.
Riccarda CaputoComputational Materials Informatics - CMI, Rome 00157, Italy.
Pierre VillarsMPDS-Villars, Vitznau 6354, Switzerland.
Adem TekinInformatics Institute, Istanbul Technical University, Istanbul 34469, Türkiye.ORCID 0000-0002-0123-4197

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Crystal structure prediction (CSP) is central to materials discovery, yet its efficiency and interpretability remain limited by the vast configurational space and reliance on costly local optimizations. Although template-based and machine-learning (ML) approaches have improved exploration, many approaches still require large data sets, complex similarity metrics, or opaque generative pipelines. In this work, we introduce PNcsp+, an enhanced and chemically interpretable CSP framework that uses the Mendeleev Periodic Number (PN) as a transparent descriptor of elemental similarity. PNcsp+ expands the original implementation through a larger prototype library, an improved data management strategy, and ML-assisted prototype scoring by combining cutting-edge neural network models such as MACE, M3GNet, and ALIGNN-FF. Despite its simplicity, PNcsp+ reaches state-of-the-art performance. In evaluations on the CSPBench data set─a curated set of 180 benchmark crystal structures for assessing CSP methods─our approach surpasses alternative methods by achieving 86.1% space group accuracy and 85.0% structure matching accuracy within the Top-5 predictions, all without structure relaxations. Moreover, our case study on several hybrid systems, including ammonium and methylammonium cations, demonstrated that molecular components emerge autonomously in the predicted lattices, guided solely by PN-derived similarity relationships. Overall, PNcsp+ shows that fundamental periodic trends, combined with targeted ML-based evaluation, offer an efficient, scalable, and interpretable CSP framework, enabling accelerated discovery across both inorganic and hybrid chemical spaces.

Identifiers

PMID41854229
PMCPMC13085239

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.