Evidence map›Paper›PMID 41854156›Full record

ArticleInternational journal of gynaecology and obstetrics: the official organ of the International Federation of Gynaecology and Obstetrics2026

Improved prognostic stratification with the FIGO 2023 endometrial cancer staging system. A multicenter Spanish cohort study.

Nadia Veiga, Pablo Padilla-Iserte, Reyes Oliver, Octavio Arencibia, Berta Díaz-Feijoo, Antonio Gil-Moreno, Pluvio Coronado, María Belén Martín-Salamanca, Manuel Pantoja-Garrido, Josefa Marcos-Sanmartin and 11 more

Abstract readMulticenter Study
In one paragraph

Article in International journal of gynaecology and obstetrics: the official organ of the International Federation of Gynaecology and Obstetrics, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

21 authors.

Nadia VeigaDepartment of Gynecology and Obstetrics, Hospital Universitario de Navarra, Pamplona, Spain.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-5761-5781
Pablo Padilla-IserteDepartment of Gynecologic Oncology, La Fe University and Polytechnic Hospital, Valencia, Spain.
Reyes OliverDepartment of Gynecologic Oncology, 12 de Octubre University Hospital, Complutense University, Madrid, Spain.
Octavio ArencibiaHospital Materno-Infantil de Canarias, Gran Canaria, Spain.
Berta Díaz-FeijooInstitute Clinic of Gynecology, Obstetrics and Neonatology, Hospital Clinic de Barcelona, Institut d'Investigacions Biomèdiques August Pi i Sunyer (IDIBAPS), Universitat de Barcelona, Barcelona, Spain.
Antonio Gil-MorenoGynecologic Oncology Unit, Gynecology Department, Hospital Universitari Vall d'Hebron, Universitat Autònoma de Barcelona, Barcelona, Spain.
Pluvio CoronadoWomen's Health Institute of the Hospital Clínico San Carlos, IdISSC, School of Medicine, Complutense University, Madrid, Spain.
María Belén Martín-SalamancaGynecology Department, Hospital Universitario de Getafe, Madrid, Spain.
Manuel Pantoja-GarridoDepartment of Gynecology and Obstetrics, University Hospital Virgen Macarena, Seville, Spain.
Josefa Marcos-SanmartinObstetrics and Gynecology Department, Dr. Balmis General University Hospital, Alicante Institute for Health and Biomedical Research (ISABIAL), Alicante, Spain.
Juan Gilabert-EstellésDepartment of Obstetrics and Gynecology, University General Hospital of Valencia, University of Valencia, Valencia, Spain.
Cristina LorenzoDepartment of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Hospital Nuestra Señora de la Candelaria, Tenerife, Spain.
Eduardo CazorlaDepartment of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Hospital Universitario de Torrevieja, Alicante, Spain.
Elena CabezasDepartment of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Hospital Universitario Ramón y Cajal, Madrid, Spain.
Fernando Roldán-RivasDepartment of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Clinico Lozano Blesa Hospital, Zaragoza, Spain.
José Ramón Rodríguez-HernándezGynaecology and Obstetrics Department University Hospital Virgen de La Arrixaca, Murcia, Spain.
Sara ÁlvarezDepartment of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Hospital Universitario de León, León, Spain.
Lourdes SánchezGynaecology and Obstetrics Department, University General Hospital of Ciudad Real, Castilla-La Mancha, Spain.
Mónica Enguita-GermanMethodology Unit, Pamplona, Spain.
Juan Carlos MuruzábalDepartment of Gynecologic Oncology, Hospital Universitario de Navarra, Pamplona, Spain.
Spain‐GOG

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

objectiveTo evaluate the impact of applying the FIGO 2023 staging system compared with FIGO 2009 in a real-world cohort of patients with early-stage endometrial cancer who underwent surgery. STUDY DESIGN/

methodsThis multicenter retrospective cohort study included patients with apparent early-stage endometrial cancer diagnosed between 2000 and 2020 across 18 Spanish centers. All patients underwent primary surgery and were classified according to both FIGO 2009 and FIGO 2023 criteria. Stage migration was assessed, and the characteristics of newly defined subgroups were described. Survival outcomes, including overall survival (OS) and progression-free survival (PFS), were compared between classifications.

resultsA total of 4566 patients were included. Application of the FIGO 2023 system resulted in stage migration in 909 patients (19.9%) compared with FIGO 2009. The FIGO 2023 system showed a higher 5-year OS for Stage I patients than the 2009 classification (91.3% vs. 88.2%). Within the new substages, 5-year OS was 93.9% in Stage IA1 and 91.9% in Stage IA2, and Stage IA3 demonstrated distinct survival outcomes. Overall survival for Stage III remained comparable between classifications, although outcomes varied across subcategories. In a simplified classification (Stages I-III), the FIGO 2023 system showed improved prognostic discrimination for both PFS and OS according to Harrell's C-index.

conclusionsThe FIGO 2023 staging system leads to substantial reclassification of early-stage endometrial cancer patients and introduces new prognostic subgroups. This increased granularity improves prognostic stratification and may support individualized treatment decisions, even when molecular testing is limited.

Indexed as

Endometrial NeoplasmsNeoplasm StagingAgedCohort StudiesFemaleHumansMiddle AgedPrognosisProgression-Free SurvivalRetrospective StudiesSpainclassificationendometrial cancerInternational Federation of Gynecology & Obstetrics staging systemoverall survivalprogression‐free survival

Identifiers

PMID41854156
PMCPMC13505222

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.