ArticleConservation biology : the journal of the Society for Conservation Biology2026
Regulatory compliance and support for altered management of the exotic pet trade.
Article in Conservation biology : the journal of the Society for Conservation Biology, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- Regulatory compliance and support for altered management of the exotic pet trade.Conservation biology : the journal of the Society for Conservation Biology · 2026Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Globally, the exotic pet trade has contributed to species invasion, disease, and animal welfare risks. Although scientists have advocated for increased trade regulation, the success of management and regulatory efforts depends on compliance by participants in the exotic pet trade. We used a regulatory compliance framework to investigate exotic pet trade participants' support for proposed changes to regulations. In 2023, we administered online surveys to 1653 exotic pet owners, breeders, and sellers in the United States. Survey respondents largely supported efforts to ensure that animals in the exotic pet trade are captive bred, appropriately housed, and provided with veterinary care. On average, respondents also supported changes to federal regulations to improve consistency in species that can be traded as pets and imported into the United States. However, individuals who opposed regulatory changes considered regulations unfair, reactive, and inconsistently enforced, distrusted management agencies, and advocated for government consultation with the exotic pet trade when designing regulations. Proponents of regulatory changes expressed moral obligation to obey regulations applied to the exotic pet trade, agreed that regulations pertaining to the exotic pet trade are ethically valid, demonstrated greater trust in government agencies, and considered regulations fair, equitable, and consistent. Our findings suggest there is a cohort of exotic pet trade participants who would collaborate with government agencies to reduce the risks associated with the pet trade, but agencies should also address pet trade participants' concerns about gaps in regulation and failures in enforcement strategies to build trust between exotic pet trade participants and government agencies.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.