Evidence map›Paper›PMID 41854017›Full record

SynthesisAnaesthesia2026

Efficacy and safety of different vasopressor infusions on feto-maternal outcomes in normotensive patients undergoing caesarean delivery: a systematic review and network meta-analysis of randomised controlled trials.

Narinder Pal Singh, Jeetinder Kaur Makkar, Bisman Jeet Kaur Khurana, Anuradha Borle, Preet Mohinder Singh

Abstract readSystematic ReviewNetwork Meta-Analysis
In one paragraph

Synthesis in Anaesthesia, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
3citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

3 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Trial
  2. Trial
  3. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors.

Narinder Pal SinghDepartment of Anaesthesiology and Pain Medicine, The Ottawa Hospital, University of Ottawa, Ottawa, Ontario, Canada.ORCID 0000-0002-1538-8728
Jeetinder Kaur MakkarDepartment of Anaesthesia and Intensive Care, Post Graduate Institute of Medical Education and Research, Chandigarh, India.ORCID 0000-0001-8159-5920
Bisman Jeet Kaur KhuranaDepartment of Anaesthesia, Punjab Institute of Liver and Biliary Sciences, SAS Nagar, Punjab, India.
Anuradha BorleDepartment of Anesthesiology, Washington University in Saint Louis, Anaesthesiology Barnes Jewish Hospital, Saint Louis, Missouri, USA.
Preet Mohinder SinghDepartment of Anesthesiology, Washington University in Saint Louis, Anaesthesiology Barnes Jewish Hospital, Saint Louis, Missouri, USA.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

introductionPhenylephrine infusion is widely endorsed by guidelines as the preferred prophylactic drug for spinal hypotension in patients undergoing caesarean delivery; however, clinical practice continues to show marked variability in the selection of vasopressor drugs. To address this, we aimed to synthesise current evidence from randomised controlled trials comparing vasopressor infusions for various feto-maternal outcomes in normotensive adult patients undergoing caesarean delivery.

methodsRandomised controlled trials evaluating maternal and fetal outcomes associated with prophylactic vasopressor infusion were identified through comprehensive database searches. Primary outcomes were the incidence of maternal hypotension and umbilical artery base excess. Secondary outcomes comprised maternal and fetal parameters including: umbilical artery and vein pH; umbilical vein base excess; Apgar scores at 1 min and 5 min; and incidence of maternal intra-operative nausea and vomiting, bradycardia, tachycardia and hypertension.

resultsFifty-five trials involving 5487 patients undergoing caesarean delivery under spinal or combined spinal and epidural anaesthesia using a variety of vasopressor infusions were included in the final analysis. Four drugs-metaraminol, noradrenaline, phenylephrine and adrenaline-were judged to be 'definitely superior' to control (no active vasopressor infusion) for the prevention of hypotension. Umbilical vessel analyses indicated that mephentermine and metaraminol provided superior preservation of both umbilical arterial and venous acid-base balance. DISCUSSION: Current evidence suggests that continuous infusions of α-agonists with mild β-activity (e.g. noradrenaline, metaraminol) are preferable to mixed adrenergic agonists such as ephedrine for preventing maternal hypotension. While these findings reinforce existing recommendations for maternal haemodynamic management, the evidence base for fetal outcomes remains limited.

Indexed as

Cesarean SectionHypotensionVasoconstrictor AgentsAdultAnesthesia, ObstetricalAnesthesia, SpinalFemaleHumansInfusions, IntravenousNorepinephrinePhenylephrinePregnancyPregnancy OutcomeRandomized Controlled Trials as TopicNorepinephrinePhenylephrineVasoconstrictor Agentscaesarean deliveryprophylacticspinal hypotensionsystematic reviewvasopressors

Identifiers

PMID41854017
PMCPMC13249524

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.