ArticleHuman brain mapping2026
Brain Age Estimation on T2-FLAIR Scans for Application to Multiple Sclerosis.
Article in Human brain mapping, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
34 authors.
Funding
Abstract
The brain-predicted age difference (brain-PAD) is associated with measures of clinical interest in people with multiple sclerosis (pwMS). Most brain age models rely on 3D T1-weighted scans, which are not routinely acquired in MS clinical practice, limiting their potential for clinical translation. We aimed to develop a model predicting brain age using T2-FLAIR, the core sequence for MS diagnosis and monitoring, and validate the resulting brain-PAD values as a biomarker of MS severity and progression. We collected 3D T2-FLAIR and 3D T1-weighted brain MRI scans to compose (i) a multicentre cohort of healthy participants for brain age modeling, and (ii) a single-centre cohort of pwMS and healthy controls for external validation. We trained and evaluated 3D convolutional neural network models predicting brain age from T2-FLAIR or T1-weighted images. Models were compared using t-tests based on bootstrapped standard errors. Saliency maps were obtained with the SmoothGrad method to visualize regions that were most important for the predictions. Finally, using a linear model framework, we clinically validated the resulting brain-PAD metric by assessing its relationship with diagnosis (MS versus healthy controls), clinical phenotype, disease duration, and physical disability as measured with the Expanded Disability Status Scale (EDSS), adjusting for age and sex. The Inception-ResNet-V2 model based on T2-FLAIR scans yielded accurate brain age predictions (test set MAE = 3.31 years, R
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.