ArticleExperimental physiology2026
Intra-set rest preserves barbell velocity during a free-weight back squat exercise by shifting energy system contribution.
Article in Experimental physiology, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- Intra-set rest preserves barbell velocity during a free-weight back squat exercise by shifting energy system contribution.Experimental physiology · 2026Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
In this study, we compared acute metabolic responses and barbell velocity loss (VL) during cluster set (CS) versus traditional set (TS) resistance exercise. Six strength-trained individuals completed two randomized crossover sessions of back squats. The CS protocol included 30 s intra-set rest intervals after the second and fourth repetitions, whereas the TS protocol used continuous repetitions. Barbell velocity, oxygen uptake and blood lactate concentrations were measured to derive model-based indices of energy system engagement. CS were associated with better preservation of barbell velocity and lower blood lactate concentrations compared with TS. Model-based indices suggested distinct metabolic patterns between set structures, with CS being associated with a higher alactic and lower lactic component than TS. Inter-individual responses were consistent across most participants. These findings indicate that acute metabolic and mechanical responses differ between CS and TS configurations. CS were associated with reduced indices of metabolic stress alongside improved velocity preservation, highlighting that set structure can influence the acute physiological-performance profile of resistance exercise.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.