Evidence map›Paper›PMID 41853877›Full record

ReviewChemSusChem2026

MoS

Merin Mary Sebastian, Zhoveta Yhobu, Alex Schechter, Nandakumar Kalarikkal

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in ChemSusChem, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
1citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

1 citing paper in PubMed.

  1. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors.

Merin Mary SebastianSchool of Pure and Applied Physics, Mahatma Gandhi University, Kottayam, India.
Zhoveta YhobuDepartment of Chemical Sciences, Ariel University, Ariel, Israel.
Alex SchechterDepartment of Chemical Sciences, Ariel University, Ariel, Israel.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-3464-1936
Nandakumar KalarikkalSchool of Pure and Applied Physics, Mahatma Gandhi University, Kottayam, India.

Funding

Board of Research in Nuclear Sciences 39/29/2015-BRNS/39009CEFIPRA 6408-1Council for Higher Education of Israel, KnowledgeDST SR/NM/NS-1420-2014(C),DST SR/NM/NS-54/2009DST: Fund for Improvement of S&T Infrastructure SR/FST/P SI-143/2009DST Promotion of University Research and Scientific Excellence SR/S9/Z-23/2010/22(C, G)Mahatma Gandhi UniversityQuantum materials for applications in sustainable technologies (QM4ST) CZ.02.01.01/00/22_008/0004572SERB: CRG CRG/2021/001506UGC-DAE UGC-DAE-CSR-KC/CRS/19/RC08/0485University Grants Commission P1400University Grants Commission P1429University Grants Commission P1460University Grants Commission P930
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Water electrochemical reactions have garnered increasing attention due to their central role in sustainable energy conversion. Amid the intensifying global energy crisis, the development of renewable pathways for green hydrogen production has become imperative. Numerous materials have been investigated as electrocatalysts for water splitting and fuel cell technologies, with molybdenum disulphide (MoS

Indexed as

hydrogen evolution reactionhydrogen oxidation reactionmolybdenum disulphideoxygen evolution reactionoxygen reduction reaction

Identifiers

PMID41853877
PMCPMC13000686

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.