ArticleFrontiers in psychology2026
Development and validation of the German Performance-related Questionnaire for Musicians (PQM) for measuring situational music performance anxiety.
Article in Frontiers in psychology, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- Measuring situational music performance anxiety - the Polish adaptation of the Performance-related Questionnaire for Musicians.Frontiers in psychology · 2025Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
2 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Introduction: When performing in public, musicians experience varying levels of music performance anxiety (MPA). The degree of MPA is influenced by various internal and external factors and differs between performances. Previous studies have mainly focused on the general disposition of MPA, but comparatively limited attention has been given to the experience of MPA in particular performance situations. In this study, the Performance-related Questionnaire for Musicians (PQM) is introduced and validated. The questionnaire was developed to assess situational MPA, thus filling a gap in standardized questionnaires relating to individual performances. Methods: The fourth revised German version of the PQM was tested regarding the reliability of the factor structure and the validity on a sample of 605 musicians. The PQM questionnaire focuses on aspects of situational MPA referring to a just-finished performance. It needs to be completed directly after a performance and considers retrospectively the times before and during the performance, as well as the moment when filling in the questionnaire after the performance. For the analysis, exploratory factor analysis (EFA) and confirmatory factor analysis (CFA) were performed. Furthermore, the questionnaire was implemented in a mobile application for the individual acquisition of PQM results across various performances. In a case study, data were analysed from 31 performances of one musician. Results: A three-dimensional factor structure at the time points before, during, and after the performance showed reliable consistencies in the EFA, and the CFA confirmed the structure with adequate model fit statistics. The three dimensions represent, first, the degree of MPA symptoms (the higher the scale, the more severe the MPA); second, coping with MPA (the higher the scale, the more positive the coping); and third, self-efficacy (the higher the scale, the more positive the self-efficacy). The results of the case study with the mobile application showed individual differences and consistencies in situational MPA between performances. Discussion: The results show that the PQM is a valid tool for assessing situational MPA. The implementation as a mobile application is described as very practical and supports the use of the PQM for individual self-assessment and feedback.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.