Evidence map›Paper›PMID 41853792›Full record

ReviewAdvances in laboratory medicine2026

The urine examination: a modern technological test with a very ancient history.

Massimo Daves, Erika Jani, Rossella Panella, Ruggero Buonocore, Stefano Pastori, Vincenzo Roccaforte

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Advances in laboratory medicine, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors.

Massimo DavesLaboratory of Clinical Biochemistry (SABES-ASDAA), Hospital of Bolzano, Bolzano, Italy.
Erika JaniLaboratory of Clinical Biochemistry (SABES-ASDAA), Hospital of Bolzano, Bolzano, Italy.
Rossella PanellaS.C. Analisi Chimico Cliniche e Microbiologiche, ASST Nord Milano, Ospedale Bassini, Cinisello Balsamo, Italy.
Ruggero BuonocoreU.O. Biochimica, Laboratory Medicine Department, Hospital Guglielmo da Saliceto of Piacenza, Piacenza, Italy.
Stefano PastoriS.C. Analisi Chimico Cliniche e Microbiologiche, ASST Nord Milano, Ospedale Bassini, Cinisello Balsamo, Italy.
Vincenzo RoccaforteS.C. Analisi Chimico Cliniche e Microbiologiche, ASST Nord Milano, Ospedale Bassini, Cinisello Balsamo, Italy.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-7113-4263

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

For centuries, the only 'semeiological and laboratory' test that the physician had at his disposal to point towards to a diagnosis was the urine test. It was based on the chemical and physical properties evaluation of the sample. During the last decade of the 20th century, the use of flow cytometry opened new perspectives in the diagnostic strategy of urine examination, making it possible to automate a typically manual procedure that was represented by reading the urine sediment under an optical microscope. The combination of fully automated physical chemical and urinary sediment testing has increased the amount of information we can obtain from a simple urine test. Today's fully automated analyzers have an accurate cell count and an excellent particle differentiation which brought a higher diagnostic reliability. Today's uranalysis is the product of many scientists, chemists, physicians, that over decades have developed, increased the accuracy, have tried to understand, and give a meaning to all aspects (physical, chemical, and morphological) that can be found in a simple urine test. Our hope is that the urine test will be increasingly re-evaluated for the enormous diagnostic potential it can offer, also in view of a medicine that is increasingly geared to the individual needs of each patient.

Indexed as

automated urine sedimentflow cytometryurineurine test

Identifiers

PMID41853792
PMCPMC12994703

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.