ReviewAdvances in laboratory medicine2026
The urine examination: a modern technological test with a very ancient history.
Review in Advances in laboratory medicine, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
For centuries, the only 'semeiological and laboratory' test that the physician had at his disposal to point towards to a diagnosis was the urine test. It was based on the chemical and physical properties evaluation of the sample. During the last decade of the 20th century, the use of flow cytometry opened new perspectives in the diagnostic strategy of urine examination, making it possible to automate a typically manual procedure that was represented by reading the urine sediment under an optical microscope. The combination of fully automated physical chemical and urinary sediment testing has increased the amount of information we can obtain from a simple urine test. Today's fully automated analyzers have an accurate cell count and an excellent particle differentiation which brought a higher diagnostic reliability. Today's uranalysis is the product of many scientists, chemists, physicians, that over decades have developed, increased the accuracy, have tried to understand, and give a meaning to all aspects (physical, chemical, and morphological) that can be found in a simple urine test. Our hope is that the urine test will be increasingly re-evaluated for the enormous diagnostic potential it can offer, also in view of a medicine that is increasingly geared to the individual needs of each patient.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.