ArticleLancet regional health. Americas2026
Mapping weight stigma in food-based dietary guidelines across thirteen countries in Latin America and the Caribbean: a qualitative analysis.
Article in Lancet regional health. Americas, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- Weight stigma in Latin America and the Caribbean: a call to action.Lancet regional health. Americas · 2026Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
7 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Background: Weight stigma is a growing public health concern with documented harms to physical, mental and social well-being. Food-Based Dietary Guidelines (FBDGs), central to nutrition education and policy, may unintentionally reinforce stigmatising narratives. In the Latin America and the Caribbean (LAC), where the obesity is shaped by complex determinants, this study aims to uncover the presence and patterns of weight stigma in national FBDGs and inform the development of more inclusive, person-centred nutrition policies. Methods: A content analysis was performed. We used the Weight Stigma Heat Map (WSHM) to assess thirteen national FBDGs and four technical documents from LAC countries. Ten thematic areas focused on language, imagery, behavioural framing, and representations of health were analysed. Inter-evaluator agreement was evaluated using Bangdiwala's test. Findings: Most FBDGs contained explicit or implicit weight-stigmatising content. Common patterns included portraying weight loss as a universal health goal, using alarmist language around obesity, and framing body weight as fully modifiable through individual behaviour, often without acknowledging individual variability or clinical context. Thinness was often linked to physical activity, while higher weight was associated with sedentarism and poor choices. Structural determinants were rarely acknowledged. Only Saint Vincent and the Grenadines adopted a more inclusive, environmentally focused approach. Inter-evaluator agreement was high (Bangdiwala's B = 0.93), supporting the reliability of the coding process. Interpretation: National FBDGs across LAC frequently reflect moralising and reductionist narratives that may perpetuate weight stigma. Revising these documents through a person-centred lens, grounded in human rights, social justice, and a multifactorial understanding of obesity is essential to promote equitable public health nutrition. Funding: No funding was received for this study.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.