Evidence map›Paper›PMID 41853743›Full record

ArticleKidney international reports2026

Sensitization and Deceased-Donor Kidney Transplant Access in France.

Dominique Bertrand, Philippe Gatault, Coralie Poulain, Charlotte Colosio, Clément Danthu, Agnès Duveau, Laure Ecotière, Cyril Garrouste, Yannick Le Meur, Marie-Pascale Morin and 3 more

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Kidney international reports, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
2citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

2 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

13 authors.

Dominique BertrandDepartment of Nephrology, Kidney Transplantation and Hemodialysis, Rouen University Hospital, Rouen, France.
Philippe GataultDepartment of Nephrology, Kidney Transplantation and Hemodialysis, Tours, University Hospital, Tours, France.
Coralie PoulainDepartment of Nephrology, Kidney Transplantation and Hemodialysis, Amiens University Hospital, Amiens, France.
Charlotte ColosioDepartment of Nephrology, Kidney Transplantation and Hemodialysis, Reims University Hospital, Reims, France.
Clément DanthuDepartment of Nephrology, Kidney Transplantation and Hemodialysis, Limoges University Hospital, Limoges, France.
Agnès DuveauDepartment of Nephrology, Kidney Transplantation and Hemodialysis, Angers University Hospital, Angers, France.
Laure EcotièreDepartment of Nephrology, Kidney Transplantation and Hemodialysis, Poitiers University Hospital, Poitiers, France.
Cyril GarrousteDepartment of Nephrology, Kidney Transplantation and Hemodialysis, Clermont Ferrand University Hospital, Clermont Ferrand, France.
Yannick Le MeurDepartment of Nephrology, Kidney Transplantation and Hemodialysis, Brest University Hospital, Brest, France.
Marie-Pascale MorinDepartment of Nephrology, Kidney Transplantation and Hemodialysis, Rennes University Hospital, Rennes, France.
Valérie ChâteletDepartment of Nephrology, Kidney Transplantation and Hemodialysis, Caen University Hospital, Caen, France.
Sophie CaillardDepartment of Nephrology, Kidney Transplantation and Hemodialysis, Strasbourg University Hospital, Strasbourg, France.
Dany AnglicheauDepartment of Nephrology and Kidney Transplantation, Necker Enfants Malades Hospital, Assistance Publique-Hôpitaux de Paris, Paris, France.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Introduction: Highly sensitized kidney transplant candidates have reduced access to deceased-donor kidney transplantation (DDKT) and worse waitlist outcomes. In France, allocation relies on sensitization-based prioritization through the acceptable-antigen pathway driven by the Methods: We conducted a retrospective multicenter cohort study including 14,485 adult kidney transplant candidates listed between 2011 and 2021. Sensitization was measured using TGI (0-100) and reported using calculated panel reactive antibody (cPRA)-labeled strata for international readability. Access to DDKT was the primary outcome, with living-donor transplantation, death, and delisting treated as competing events. The secondary outcome was waitlist attrition (death or delisting). Fine-Gray models adjusted for key demographic, clinical, and immunologic variables were truncated at 10 years. Results: Access to DDKT declined progressively with increasing sensitization and fell sharply from cPRA ≥ 96%. Compared with cPRA 0%, the adjusted subdistribution hazard ratio (SHR) for DDKT was 0.781 at 96%, 0.658 at 97%, 0.701 at 98%, 0.353 at 99%, and 0.082 at 100%. Conversely, the risk of waitlist attrition increased from cPRA ≥ 97% (sHR: 1.793), reaching 2.713 at 100%. Candidates with cPRA of 85% to 95% retained preserved access, consistent with the intended effect of the acceptable-antigen pathway. Conclusion: In the French TGI-based allocation system, cPRA ≥ 96% marks a threshold of impaired access to DDKT, whereas cPRA ≥ 97% identifies excess waitlist attrition. These findings define an ultrasensitized subgroup insufficiently served by current prioritization and support refined allocation strategies within the 96% to 100% range.

Indexed as

allocation policydesensitizationFine and Gray modelHLA sensitizationkidney transplantation

Identifiers

PMID41853743
PMCPMC12992927

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.