ArticleJSES reviews, reports, and techniques2026
Validation of a web-based questionnaire for shoulder disorder diagnosis and staging.
Article in JSES reviews, reports, and techniques, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Background: Shoulder pain is one of the most common musculoskeletal disorders globally, often requiring prolonged care and resulting in high healthcare costs. Telemedicine and remote rehabilitation show promise in managing these conditions, but standardized and reliable assessment tools remain limited. This study aimed to validate a novel web-based, self-administered questionnaire for estimating disease phases and specific diagnoses of shoulder disorders. Methods: A cross-sectional study was conducted with 30 participants reporting shoulder pain or restricted shoulder movement. Each participant completed a web application consisting of 33 symptom- and movement-related questions. The application guided users through the assessment using written and video instructions. Two experienced physical therapists independently evaluated each participant. In cases of disagreement, they discussed until reaching a consensus. Agreement rates between the web application and the therapists' consensus diagnoses were calculated in 4 domains: (1) classifying cases as shoulder-related vs. non-shoulder-related conditions, (2) classifying disease phase (inflammatory vs. noninflammatory), (3) identifying specific disorders, and (4) agreement across all 3 criteria. Results: The application accurately distinguished shoulder disorders from other conditions in 100% of cases. Among 27 participants with shoulder disorders, the disease phase was correctly classified in 92.6%, and specific diagnoses in 74.1%. Overall agreement across all 3 domains was 70%. Rotator cuff injuries were the most common diagnosis (70%). Conclusion: The web application showed high diagnostic agreement with experienced physical therapists and may be a useful screening and diagnostic tool for shoulder disorders in both clinical and remote settings. Larger studies are needed to confirm its utility and improve the algorithm.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.