ArticleJSES reviews, reports, and techniques2026
Examining the Disabilities of the Arm, Shoulder, and Hand outcome instrument in extended reality: X-DASH.
Article in JSES reviews, reports, and techniques, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
8 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Background: Patient-reported outcome measures (PROMs) rely on individual interpretation of questions and recall ability, which limits their standardization. We developed an extended reality (XR) PROM, transforming questions from the Disabilities of the Arm, Shoulder, and Hand (DASH) measure into standardized tasks and assessed its usability, validity, and reliability (X-DASH). We hypothesized that the X-DASH would show equivalent preliminary validity and reliability as conventionally administered DASH questions (C-DASH). Methods: The X-DASH simulated 6 activities corresponding to the DASH questionnaire (jar opening, key turning, surface cleaning, back washing, bread cutting, and hammering) and was evaluated in 2 phases. In phase 1, usability was assessed with 20 healthy subjects using the System Usability Scale. In both phases, versions of the questionnaire were delivered conventionally via computer (C-DASH) and using X-DASH. Phase 2 included 40 patients with documented shoulder pathology using a randomized, cross-sectional design. Results: Phase 1: X-DASH scores were significantly higher (ie, worse) than C-DASH scores ( Conclusion: To our knowledge, this is the first study to evaluate XR-based PROM delivery. The X-DASH shows similarities to C-DASH in our proof of concept, though scoring differences compared to C-DASH warrant further investigation.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.