Evidence map›Paper›PMID 41853703›Full record

ArticleApplied microbiology (Basel, Switzerland)2024

Changes in the Skin Microbiome Following Dermatological Procedures: A Scoping Review.

Jeremy R Ellis, Eron J Powell, Luke M Tomasovic, Rachel L Marcheskie, Vishruth Girish, Anmol Warman, Darshan Sivaloganathan

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Applied microbiology (Basel, Switzerland), 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 10 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
10citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

10 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Trial
  2. The cutaneous microbiome as a dynamic photoprotective interface against solar radiation.Photochemical & photobiological sciences : Official journal of the European Photochemistry Association and the European Society for Photobiology · 2026
    Review
  3. The exposomal imprint on rosacea: More than skin deep.Journal of the European Academy of Dermatology and Venereology : JEADV · 2026
    Review
  4. Review
  5. Review
  6. Review
  7. Article
  8. Review
  9. Article
  10. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors.

Jeremy R EllisSchool of Medicine, Johns Hopkins University, Baltimore, MD 21205, USA.ORCID 0000-0002-6198-1661
Eron J PowellSchool of Biological Sciences, The University of Utah, Salt Lake City, UT 84112, USA.
Luke M TomasovicSchool of Medicine, Johns Hopkins University, Baltimore, MD 21205, USA.ORCID 0000-0002-1459-3252
Rachel L MarcheskieJohns Hopkins Bloomberg School of Public Health, Baltimore, MD 21205, USA.ORCID 0009-0000-3289-7690
Vishruth GirishSchool of Medicine, Johns Hopkins University, Baltimore, MD 21205, USA.ORCID 0000-0002-3848-7374
Anmol WarmanSchool of Medicine, Johns Hopkins University, Baltimore, MD 21205, USA.
Darshan SivaloganathanSchool of Medicine, Johns Hopkins University, Baltimore, MD 21205, USA.ORCID 0000-0003-3011-2997

Funding

Medical Scientist Training ProgramT32GM136577 · NIGMS · JOHNS HOPKINS UNIVERSITY · PI ANDREA L COX · 2020 to 2026
$13.4M
NIGMS NIH HHS T32 GM136577
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The skin microbiome consists of bacteria, fungi, viruses, and mites, which play a crucial role in maintaining skin health and immune function. Imbalances in this microbial community, known as dysbiosis, are implicated in various dermatological conditions. While skincare products are known to influence the skin microbiome, the effects of dermatological procedures have not been extensively studied. Here, we perform a scoping review to outline the studies investigating the impacts of dermatological interventions on the skin microbiome. Phototherapy emerged as the most studied intervention, encompassing UV phototherapy, light therapy, laser therapy, and photodynamic therapy. Chemical interventions, such as chemical peels, micropigmentation, and debridement, have comparatively limited studies describing their impacts on the skin microbiome. To date, no studies have been done on a wide variety of common dermatological procedures such as cryotherapy, skin grafts, and dermabrasion, which may have stronger likelihoods of affecting the skin microbiome. This underscores the need for further research on the influences of dermatological procedures, especially chemical and physical interventions, on the skin microbiome. More comprehensive pre-clinical and clinical studies are essential not only for understanding the long-term consequences of these procedures, but also for optimizing patient outcomes in dermatological care.

Indexed as

cutaneous microbiomedermatological interventiondysbiosisskin microbiome

Identifiers

PMID41853703
PMCPMC12994279

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.