ArticleEuropean heart journal. Digital health2026
Artificial intelligence-based automated interpretation of images of electrocardiograms: development and multinational validation of ECG-GPT.
Article in European heart journal. Digital health, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
3 citing papers in PubMed.
- Artificial intelligence and the evolution of the electrocardiogram: from cardiovascular diagnostic tool to digital biomarker.European heart journal. Digital health · 2026Review
- Foundation models for cardiovascular diseases and medicine.European heart journal. Digital health · 2026Review
- ECG-GPT: considerations for advancing toward clinical implementation.European heart journal. Digital health · 2026Article
Corrections and comments
- Update of
Authors and funding
15 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Aims: Timely, accurate assessment of electrocardiograms (ECGs) is crucial for diagnosing, triaging, and managing patients. However, this often relies on expert interpretation, a major bottleneck in low-resource settings. We developed and validated ECG-GPT, a format-independent vision encoder-decoder model that generates expert-level interpretations from 12-lead ECG images. Methods and results: We developed ECG-GPT using 12-lead ECGs and their corresponding diagnosis statements performed at a large US health system between 2000 and 2022. Using structured clinical assessment, semantic similarity, and conventional metrics, we validated ECG-GPT across seven distinct health settings, including three large and diverse US health systems, ECGs from Minas Gerais, Brazil, the UK Biobank, the Germany-based PTB-XL dataset, and a community hospital in Missouri. In total, 2.9 million ECGs were used for model development, and 4.1 million ECGs for validation. The model performed well in clinical assessment across 26 extracted labels, with diagnostic accuracy ranging from 0.93 to 0.99. For rhythm abnormalities, including atrial fibrillation, sinus tachycardia, sinus bradycardia, premature atrial contractions, and premature ventricular contractions, AUROCs ranged from 0.80 to 0.95. For conduction abnormalities, including left bundle branch block, right bundle branch block, first degree atrioventricular block, left anterior fascicular block, and left posterior fascicular block, AUROCs ranged from 0.88 to 0.96. ECG-GPT identified the full context of diagnosis statements with allied conditions with a median pairwise similarity of 0.90, significantly greater than baseline ( Conclusion: We developed and validated a vision encoder-decoder model that generates expert-level interpretations from ECG images, a scalable strategy for accessible automated ECG analysis.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.