Evidence map›Paper›PMID 41853639›Full record

ArticleEuropean heart journal. Digital health2026

Artificial intelligence-based automated interpretation of images of electrocardiograms: development and multinational validation of ECG-GPT.

Akshay Khunte, Veer Sangha, Evangelos K Oikonomou, Lovedeep S Dhingra, Arya Aminorroaya, Andreas Coppi, Sumukh Vasisht Shankar, Elijah Rockers, Bobak J Mortazavi, Deepak L Bhatt and 5 more

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in European heart journal. Digital health, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
3citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

3 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Review
  2. Foundation models for cardiovascular diseases and medicine.European heart journal. Digital health · 2026
    Review
  3. ECG-GPT: considerations for advancing toward clinical implementation.European heart journal. Digital health · 2026
    Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

15 authors.

Akshay KhunteSection of Cardiovascular Medicine, Department of Internal Medicine, Yale School of Medicine, 195 Church St, 6th Floor, New Haven, CT 06510, USA.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0003-3812-3260
Veer SanghaSection of Cardiovascular Medicine, Department of Internal Medicine, Yale School of Medicine, 195 Church St, 6th Floor, New Haven, CT 06510, USA.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-8524-1203
Evangelos K OikonomouSection of Cardiovascular Medicine, Department of Internal Medicine, Yale School of Medicine, 195 Church St, 6th Floor, New Haven, CT 06510, USA.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0003-4362-0720
Lovedeep S DhingraSection of Cardiovascular Medicine, Department of Internal Medicine, Yale School of Medicine, 195 Church St, 6th Floor, New Haven, CT 06510, USA.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-5664-4126
Arya AminorroayaSection of Cardiovascular Medicine, Department of Internal Medicine, Yale School of Medicine, 195 Church St, 6th Floor, New Haven, CT 06510, USA.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0003-3197-2657
Andreas CoppiSection of Cardiovascular Medicine, Department of Internal Medicine, Yale School of Medicine, 195 Church St, 6th Floor, New Haven, CT 06510, USA.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-5243-552X
Sumukh Vasisht ShankarSection of Cardiovascular Medicine, Department of Internal Medicine, Yale School of Medicine, 195 Church St, 6th Floor, New Haven, CT 06510, USA.ORCID https://orcid.org/0009-0005-3034-0641
Elijah RockersCenter for Cardiovascular Computational & Precision Health, Houston Methodist DeBakey Heart & Vascular Center, Houston, TX, USA.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0003-1488-7661
Bobak J MortazaviCenter for Outcomes Research and Evaluation, Yale-New Haven Hospital, New Haven, CT, USA.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-2655-2095
Deepak L BhattMount Sinai Fuster Heart Hospital, Icahn School of Medicine at Mount Sinai, New York, NY, USA.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-1278-6245
Harlan M KrumholzSection of Cardiovascular Medicine, Department of Internal Medicine, Yale School of Medicine, 195 Church St, 6th Floor, New Haven, CT 06510, USA.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0003-2046-127X
Sadeer Al-KindiCenter for Cardiovascular Computational & Precision Health, Houston Methodist DeBakey Heart & Vascular Center, Houston, TX, USA.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-1122-7695
Girish N NadkarniWindreich Department of Artificial Intelligence and Human Health, Icahn School of Medicine at Mount Sinai, New York, NY 10029, USA.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0001-6319-4314
Akhil VaidWindreich Department of Artificial Intelligence and Human Health, Icahn School of Medicine at Mount Sinai, New York, NY 10029, USA.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-3343-744X
Rohan KheraSection of Cardiovascular Medicine, Department of Internal Medicine, Yale School of Medicine, 195 Church St, 6th Floor, New Haven, CT 06510, USA.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0001-9467-6199

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Aims: Timely, accurate assessment of electrocardiograms (ECGs) is crucial for diagnosing, triaging, and managing patients. However, this often relies on expert interpretation, a major bottleneck in low-resource settings. We developed and validated ECG-GPT, a format-independent vision encoder-decoder model that generates expert-level interpretations from 12-lead ECG images. Methods and results: We developed ECG-GPT using 12-lead ECGs and their corresponding diagnosis statements performed at a large US health system between 2000 and 2022. Using structured clinical assessment, semantic similarity, and conventional metrics, we validated ECG-GPT across seven distinct health settings, including three large and diverse US health systems, ECGs from Minas Gerais, Brazil, the UK Biobank, the Germany-based PTB-XL dataset, and a community hospital in Missouri. In total, 2.9 million ECGs were used for model development, and 4.1 million ECGs for validation. The model performed well in clinical assessment across 26 extracted labels, with diagnostic accuracy ranging from 0.93 to 0.99. For rhythm abnormalities, including atrial fibrillation, sinus tachycardia, sinus bradycardia, premature atrial contractions, and premature ventricular contractions, AUROCs ranged from 0.80 to 0.95. For conduction abnormalities, including left bundle branch block, right bundle branch block, first degree atrioventricular block, left anterior fascicular block, and left posterior fascicular block, AUROCs ranged from 0.88 to 0.96. ECG-GPT identified the full context of diagnosis statements with allied conditions with a median pairwise similarity of 0.90, significantly greater than baseline ( Conclusion: We developed and validated a vision encoder-decoder model that generates expert-level interpretations from ECG images, a scalable strategy for accessible automated ECG analysis.

Indexed as

Artificial intelligenceDigital healthElectrocardiography

Identifiers

PMID41853639
PMCPMC12993923

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.