Evidence map›Paper›PMID 41853637›Full record

ArticleEuropean heart journal. Digital health2026

Establishment and validation of an electrocardiogram vector-based machine learning model for the conversion of prone position electrocardiograms into standard electrocardiograms.

Hao Zhang, Zhong-Jian Li, Shi-Feng Li, Xian Shao, Fang-Fang Zhang, Zheng-Kai Xue, Zi-Liang Chen, Jun-Yu Liu, Shen-Da Hong, Shi-Jia Geng and 7 more

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in European heart journal. Digital health, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

17 authors.

Hao ZhangTianjin Key Laboratory of Ionic-Molecular Function of Cardiovascular Disease, Department of Cardiology, Tianjin Institute of Cardiology, Second Hospital of Tianjin Medical University, 23 Pingjiang Road, Hexi District, Tianjin 300211, China.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0003-3737-392X
Zhong-Jian LiInstitute of Electrocardiology of Zhengzhou University, Department of Electrocardiography, The Second Affiliated Hospital of Zhengzhou University, Zhengzhou, China.
Shi-Feng LiInstitute of Electrocardiology of Zhengzhou University, Department of Electrocardiography, The Second Affiliated Hospital of Zhengzhou University, Zhengzhou, China.
Xian ShaoDivision of Nephrology, National Clinical Research Center for Kidney Disease, State Key Laboratory of Organ Failure Research, Nanfang Hospital, Southern Medical University, Guangzhou, China.
Fang-Fang ZhangInstitute of Electrocardiology of Zhengzhou University, Department of Electrocardiography, The Second Affiliated Hospital of Zhengzhou University, Zhengzhou, China.
Zheng-Kai XueTianjin Key Laboratory of Ionic-Molecular Function of Cardiovascular Disease, Department of Cardiology, Tianjin Institute of Cardiology, Second Hospital of Tianjin Medical University, 23 Pingjiang Road, Hexi District, Tianjin 300211, China.
Zi-Liang ChenTianjin Key Laboratory of Ionic-Molecular Function of Cardiovascular Disease, Department of Cardiology, Tianjin Institute of Cardiology, Second Hospital of Tianjin Medical University, 23 Pingjiang Road, Hexi District, Tianjin 300211, China.
Jun-Yu LiuTianjin Key Laboratory of Ionic-Molecular Function of Cardiovascular Disease, Department of Cardiology, Tianjin Institute of Cardiology, Second Hospital of Tianjin Medical University, 23 Pingjiang Road, Hexi District, Tianjin 300211, China.
Shen-Da HongNational Institute of Health Data Science and Institute of Medical Technology, Health Science Center, Peking University, Beijing, China.
Shi-Jia GengHeartVoice Medical Technology, Hefei, China.
Xu-Hong GengDepartment of Function, Fourth Hospital of Hebei Medical University, Shijiazhuang, China.
Jian-Dong ZhouDepartment of Family Medicine and Primary Care, Li Ka Shing Faculty of Medicine, The University of Hong Kong, Hong Kong SAR, China.
Gary TseTianjin Key Laboratory of Ionic-Molecular Function of Cardiovascular Disease, Department of Cardiology, Tianjin Institute of Cardiology, Second Hospital of Tianjin Medical University, 23 Pingjiang Road, Hexi District, Tianjin 300211, China.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0001-5510-1253
Xing LiuTianjin Key Laboratory of Ionic-Molecular Function of Cardiovascular Disease, Department of Cardiology, Tianjin Institute of Cardiology, Second Hospital of Tianjin Medical University, 23 Pingjiang Road, Hexi District, Tianjin 300211, China.
Hua-Yue TaoNetwork Information Center, the Second Hospital of Tianjin Medical University, Tianjin, China.
Tong LiuTianjin Key Laboratory of Ionic-Molecular Function of Cardiovascular Disease, Department of Cardiology, Tianjin Institute of Cardiology, Second Hospital of Tianjin Medical University, 23 Pingjiang Road, Hexi District, Tianjin 300211, China.
Kang-Yin ChenTianjin Key Laboratory of Ionic-Molecular Function of Cardiovascular Disease, Department of Cardiology, Tianjin Institute of Cardiology, Second Hospital of Tianjin Medical University, 23 Pingjiang Road, Hexi District, Tianjin 300211, China.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0001-7056-6438

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Aims: The prone electrocardiogram (ECG) presents challenges in detecting anterior ST-segment elevated myocardial infarction (STEMI). This study aims to develop a method to convert prone ECGs to standard ECGs to facilitate physician diagnosis of STEMI and other cardiovascular diseases (CVD). Methods and results: The standard ECGs, vectorcardiograms (VCGs), and prone ECGs were prospectively examined for model development. Three conversion approaches were developed: direct lead matching by linear regression (Approach 1), conversion from prone ECGs to VCGs via regression and then to standard ECGs (Approach 2), and machine-learning (ML)-based models (Approach 3). External validation was done with a separate cohort, and a hybrid model was created by integrating the best-performing morphology and amplitude models. The diagnostic performance of the converted ECGs was reviewed by nine cardiologists and benchmarked against the original ECG interpretations. Five hundred and ninety prone ECG cardiac cycles from seventy participants [median age 64 years, interquartile range (IQR) 27.0-70.0] were analysed for model development. The external validation cohort had 94 patients (median age 56.5 years, IQR 39.3-67.0). Approach 3 had the best morphology accuracy, and Approach 2 had the best amplitude similarity. These two models were combined into a hybrid model. In the external validation dataset, the AUCs (95% confidence intervals) for detecting normal ECGs, anterior ST-segment elevation/depression, old anterior myocardial infarction, and bundle branch blocks were 0.835 (0.734-0.908), 0.825 (0.693-0.923), 0.898 (0.799-0.957), 0.867 (0.622-0.956), and 0.910 (0.714-0.953), respectively. Conclusion: The successful development of models for converting prone ECGs to standard ECGs demonstrated good and robust diagnostic performance for CVD.

Indexed as

ElectrocardiogramMachine learningProne electrocardiogramProne ventilationRandom forest

Identifiers

PMID41853637
PMCPMC12994467

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.