ArticleAmerican heart journal plus : cardiology research and practice2026
Analgesic use and changes in renal function in patients with heart failure in a real-world setting: a descriptive study using an electronic medical record database.
Article in American heart journal plus : cardiology research and practice, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Objectives: To evaluate the incidence of analgesic use and changes in the estimated glomerular filtration rate (eGFR) of patients with heart failure (HF), with and without analgesic use in a real-world Japanese setting. Methods: This retrospective descriptive study collected data from a large electronic medical records database. Between 2012 and 2019, patients aged 18 years or older were included if they were tested for brain natriuretic peptide (BNP) or N-terminal pro-BNP for the first time and were diagnosed with HF within 30 days of the inspection date. We calculated the daily number of patients using any analgesic and described the patient characteristics for each prescribed analgesic, which were classified into acetaminophen (APAP), non-steroidal anti-inflammatory drugs (NSAIDs), selective cyclo‑oxygenase 2 inhibitors, opioids, concomitant users of any analgesic, and non-users. We longitudinally followed the eGFR trend for 2 years using a generalized additive model (GAM) in each group. Results: Among 159,854 eligible patients, 17.8% received analgesics within 90 days of the study entry date. APAP was administered to 51.7% of single analgesic users, followed by NSAIDs (38.7%). GAMs revealed that the eGFR of patients with HF declined only slightly over 2 years, regardless of analgesic use. Even among patients with low renal function at the HF diagnosis, renal function tended to be preserved. Conclusion: This study showed that some patients with HF may need analgesics from the early period after initial HF diagnosis, and that eGFR may be preserved in the long term in real-world practice regardless of analgesic use.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.