ArticleFrontiers in pharmacology2026
Real-world evidence for atropine titration in myopia control: a comparative study of three low-dose regimens in Chinese children.
Article in Frontiers in pharmacology, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
14 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Purpose: To evaluate and compare the efficacy of 0.01%, 0.025%, and 0.05% atropine eye drops in slowing myopia progression among Chinese children aged 6-18 years, focusing on changes in spherical equivalent (SE) and axial length (AL). Methods: In this prospective, real world based, multi-center study, 175 children with myopia were followed for 12 months at three tertiary ophthalmic hospitals in China. Participants received nightly instillations of 0.01%, 0.025%, or 0.05% atropine in affected eyes. Primary outcomes included changes in SE and AL. Secondary outcomes involved corneal curvature, intraocular pressure, and biometric parameters. Statistical analyses included repeated-measures ANOVA, linear regression, and seemingly unrelated regression models. Results: All three concentrations demonstrated effectiveness in reducing myopia progression. At 12 months, SE progression was lowest in the 0.05% group (-0.27 ± 0.72 D), followed by 0.025% (-0.35 ± 0.59 D) and 0.01% (-0.44 ± 1.02 D), with a significant difference between 0.05% and 0.01% (P = 0.014). AL elongation was numerically lowest in the 0.025% group (0.21 ± 0.19 mm), while differences among groups were not statistically significant (P = 0.299). Regression analysis showed that AL change explained over 34% of SE variation in the 0.025% and 0.05% groups, compared to 14% in the 0.01% group. Conclusion: Low-concentration atropine is effective in controlling myopia progression in children. Among the three concentrations, 0.025% atropine offers better efficacy and tolerability, providing comparable axial elongation control to 0.05% with potentially fewer side effects. These findings support its use as a first-line pharmacologic option for pediatric myopia management in clinical practice.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.