ArticleACS ES&T water2026
The Legacy of Conventional Oil and Gas Development Outweighs Shale Gas Impacts on Stream Biodiversity.
Article in ACS ES&T water, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
7 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Unconventional oil and gas development (UOGD) has expanded rapidly across the Appalachian Basin, raising concerns about its ecological effects. Although UOGD has been linked to water quality changes that may affect stream biota, a generalized relationship with stream biota remains unresolved. We evaluated how UOGD and conventional oil and gas development (COGD) influence benthic macroinvertebrate (BMI) communities across the Marcellus Shale region of Pennsylvania using one of the most comprehensive statewide BMI datasets, integrating delineated catchments, oil-gas records, and more than 6800 BMI samples. Linear mixed-effect models and co-occurrence network analyses were used to quantify effects on BMI taxonomy, functionality, and network structure while controlling for confounding factors. We found no significant association between UOGD intensity and BMI diversity metrics, whereas COGD intensity was correlated with reduced richness, diversity, and biotic integritycomparable to the impact of developed land cover. Network analyses indicated altered community structures near both development types: COGD was linked to larger, more connected networks dominated by pollution-tolerant taxa, while UOGD was associated with larger but more fragmented networks. Both forms of development were tied to increases in generalist taxa and declines in specialists. Overall, UOGD exerted limited but detectable ecological effects, whereas COGD imposed broader stress on stream communities.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.