Evidence map›Paper›PMID 41853457›Full record

ArticleMedEdPORTAL : the journal of teaching and learning resources2026

Exploring the Complexity of Considering Race in the Practice of Medicine.

Shawn Koh

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in MedEdPORTAL : the journal of teaching and learning resources, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

1 author.

Shawn KohAssociate Professor, Department of Medical Education, California University of Science and Medicine-School of Medicine.ORCID https://orcid.org/0009-0006-2100-8281

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Introduction: In recent years, educators and clinicians have advocated moving away from race-based medicine toward race-conscious medicine. Yet, few studies have evaluated the impact of teaching preclerkship medical students skills to critically evaluate various frameworks for understanding the role of race in clinical decision-making. This educational innovation was designed to review various frameworks, prompt clinical evaluation, and evaluate how student perspectives were shaped by their learning. Methods: We delivered a 90-minute interactive session focused on recognizing, appraising, and considering alternatives to the framework of race-based medicine. Ninety-two first-year medical students attended this mandatory session. Student opinions on how race should be used in medicine were measured via pre- and postsession Likert-style surveys (response rates 57% and 48%). Results: While most students initially thought race was a helpful marker of genetically associated disease risk, postsession responses shifted significantly ( Discussion: This single session presentation led to increased concern regarding the use of race-based tools and guidelines in medicine. It supports the value of clinically relevant discussions of race and medicine with preclerkship medical students.

Indexed as

Racial GroupsStudents, MedicalClinical Decision-MakingEducation, Medical, UndergraduateHumansSurveys and Questionnairesand InclusionDiversityEquityHealth EquityRace-Based MedicineRace-Conscious Medicine

Identifiers

PMID41853457
PMCPMC12992537

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.