ReviewCureus2026
Processed EEG Artifacts and Pitfalls: A Narrative Review and a Troubleshooting Mnemonic.
Review in Cureus, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Processed electroencephalography (EEG) is widely used for depth of anesthesia monitoring. However, multiple interference sources can distort raw EEG data, leading to misinterpretation of quantitative EEG (qEEG) indices, potentially resulting in insufficient or excessive depth of anesthesia or burst suppression. This review summarizes qEEG interference and artifact sources, as well as some paradoxical effects and pitfalls, reported in the literature. These factors can be categorized into pharmacological, electromagnetic and mechanical, pathophysiological, and model-related sources. When unexpected qEEG values lack an immediately apparent explanation, a structured approach can be valuable, particularly in complex circumstances. We provide a relatable mnemonic "ANESTHESIA" for troubleshooting potential interference sources. If artifact removal is impractical, this should be acknowledged when adjusting the anesthetic management plan. A systematic approach to identify qEEG artifacts and acknowledge potential pitfalls may improve the reliability of depth of anesthesia monitoring, ultimately enhancing patient safety.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.