ReviewThe World Allergy Organization journal2026
What is new on the horizon for the biologics world: New kids of the block - WAO state of art.
Review in The World Allergy Organization journal, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
2 citing papers in PubMed.
- Rethinking Monospecific Antibody Therapy in Chronic Rhinosinusitis with Nasal Polyps: Dual- and Multispecific Antibodies.Clinical reviews in allergy & immunology · 2026Review
- Chronic spontaneous cholinergic urticaria: advances in immunological mechanisms focusing on neuro-immune crosstalk and novel targeted therapeutic strategies.Frontiers in immunology · 2026Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
28 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Background: Advances in the understanding of type 2 inflammation have driven the development of novel biologics and small molecules for allergic diseases. New therapies targeting cytokines, receptors, and intracellular pathways offer opportunities to refine disease management and modify long-term outcomes. Methods: The World Allergy Organization (WAO) Biologics Therapies in Allergic Diseases Committee conducted this state-of-the-art review. We analyzed current literature on investigational monoclonal antibodies, nanobody-based agents, kinase inhibitors, and small molecules with potential applications in asthma, chronic rhinosinusitis with nasal polyposis, atopic dermatitis, and chronic spontaneous urticaria. Mechanistic considerations, therapeutic targets, and clinical trial outcomes were evaluated to highlight emerging trends in biologic and small-molecule therapy. Results: Biologics targeting IL-4, IL-5, IL-13, IL-31, TSLP, and IgE continue to expand therapeutic options across allergic disorders. Innovations such as Fc-engineered antibodies, bispecific antibodies, and nanobody platforms enhance efficacy, extend half-life, and improve tissue penetration. Novel intracellular inhibitors, including JAK, SYK, and STAT6 degraders, show promise as oral alternatives to injectable therapies. Clinical trials report high efficacy and favorable safety profiles, though variability remains across diseases and endotypes. Pediatric data are limited, and the long-term safety and cost-effectiveness of this approach require further evaluation. Conclusions: Emerging biologics and small molecules are transforming the therapeutic landscape of allergic diseases, providing targeted and personalized interventions. Advances in molecular engineering, particularly nanobody technology and intracellular inhibitors, hold promise for improving patient outcomes and reducing treatment burden. Future research should prioritize long-term safety and standardized approaches to optimize integration of these therapies into clinical practice.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.