ReviewADMET & DMPK2026
Injectable hydrogels for bone regeneration: mechanical reinforcement strategies using nanoparticles and nanofibers.
Review in ADMET & DMPK, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
2 citing papers in PubMed.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Background and Purpose: The growing demand for bone regeneration following severe injuries highlights the importance of scaffolds in bone tissue engineering (BTE). Injectable hydrogels have emerged as promising candidates because their properties closely mimic the native extracellular matrix (ECM). However, their limited mechanical strength and structural instability restrict their practical application. Approach: This review summarizes recent strategies for reinforcing in situ-forming injectable hydrogels to improve their mechanical performance for bone regeneration. Particular emphasis is placed on nanomaterial-based strategies, including the incorporation of nanoparticles and nanofibers, and their ability to enhance the physical properties of polymeric networks. Key Results: Evidence from recent studies demonstrates that reinforcing hydrogels with nano-scaled materials creates interconnected networks that improve load-bearing capacity, stability, and resistance to deformation. These reinforced systems retain the inherent advantages of injectable hydrogels-biocompatibility, biodegradability, permeability to oxygen and nutrients, and drug delivery capability-while addressing their mechanical shortcomings. Conclusion: Nanomaterial-based reinforcement offers a versatile approach to overcoming the limitations of injectable hydrogels in BTE. By providing improved structural integrity alongside biological functionality, these advanced systems broaden the potential of injectable hydrogels for clinical translation. Future work should focus on optimizing reinforcement strategies to balance mechanical enhancement with safety, manufacturability, and regulatory considerations.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.