ArticleFrontiers in neurology
fNIRS-based early identification of mild cognitive impairment: a large-scale multi-paradigm study with ensemble machine learning models.
Article in Frontiers in neurology. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
10 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Background: Early and accurate identification of mild cognitive impairment (MCI) is crucial for timely intervention and preventing further cognitive decline. Functional near-infrared spectroscopy (fNIRS) is a non-invasive, portable tool for clinical screening, but its diagnostic accuracy is often constrained by single-paradigm approaches and small sample sizes. To address this limitation, this study aimed to develop and validate an efficient early MCI screening model by integrating large-sample fNIRS data from resting-state and 1-back task paradigms using ensemble machine learning, thereby enhancing the accuracy and reliability of early MCI diagnosis. Methods: A total of 462 right-handed participants (185 MCI patients and 277 healthy controls, aged 58 -87 years) were included in the final analysis after screening, with MCI diagnosis jointly determined by two experienced neurologists based on Petersen's criteria. fNIRS signals were collected during resting-state and 1-back task sessions; after preprocessing in MATLAB, features were extracted from oxygenated hemoglobin (HbO) signals of both paradigms. Results: Feature selection was performed via a gradient boosting classifier based on feature importance scores, resulting in 108 selected features. Five classifiers were trained and evaluated using 10-fold cross-validation. The integrated dataset combining resting-state and 1-back task features outperformed the single-paradigm datasets: the Neural Network model on this integrated dataset achieved an accuracy of 86.49%, sensitivity of 94.74%, specificity of 77.78%, and Area Under the Curve (AUC) of 93.49%. In contrast, the Nearest Neighbor model on the resting-state dataset and the Decision Tree model on the 1-back task dataset yielded accuracies of 70.27% and 75.68%, respectively. Group classification using MoCA scores achieved an accuracy of 86.55%, which was comparable to single-paradigm machine learning models but inferior to the integrated model. Discussion: This study demonstrates the value of a large-sample, data-driven approach and multi-paradigm feature integration in fNIRS-based MCI screening, providing an efficient diagnostic model for clinical application. Clinical trial registration: https://www.chictr.org.cn/showprojEN.html?proj=192047.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.