Evidence map›Paper›PMID 41853148›Full record

ArticleFrontiers in public health2026

Impact, use, and implications of artificial intelligence in public health decision making by elected officials: a scoping review.

Elizabeth A Campbell, Hannah Goodtree, Sarah Gillani, Oluremilekun Oyefolu, Alison Kelly, Caitlin Rivers, Crystal Watson

Abstract readScoping Review
In one paragraph

Article in Frontiers in public health, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
2citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

2 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors.

Elizabeth A CampbellJohns Hopkins University Center for Health Security, Baltimore, MD, United States.
Hannah GoodtreeJohns Hopkins University Center for Health Security, Baltimore, MD, United States.
Sarah GillaniJohns Hopkins University Center for Health Security, Baltimore, MD, United States.
Oluremilekun OyefoluJohns Hopkins University Center for Health Security, Baltimore, MD, United States.
Alison KellyJohns Hopkins University Center for Health Security, Baltimore, MD, United States.
Caitlin RiversJohns Hopkins University Center for Health Security, Baltimore, MD, United States.
Crystal WatsonJohns Hopkins University Center for Health Security, Baltimore, MD, United States.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Introduction: Artificial intelligence (AI) offers considerable promise for strengthening governmental public health decision making by supporting rapid, comprehensive analysis of complex data. Although AI applications have been widely examined in clinical and academic settings, their use in public health agencies and policymaking remains less well understood. Methods: This scoping review assessed how AI has been applied to support decision making by public health professionals and elected officials in both routine and crisis contexts. Using PRISMA-ScR guidelines, we searched PubMed, OAISTER, and Web of Science for literature published between 2014 and 2024. From 13,239 records identified, seven studies met final inclusion criteria. Results: The identified evidence base is primarily descriptive and exploratory, with limited empirical evaluation of outcomes or effectiveness. All included studies described AI use during the COVID-19 pandemic, focusing on vaccination decision support, contact tracing, quarantine enforcement, and/or movement restrictions, which limits generalizability to other public health contexts and decision-making scenarios. Findings highlight a small but emerging evidence base, with most applications developed in response to emergencies rather than embedded in routine practice. Discussion: Future opportunities for AI include advancing surveillance, communication, and resource allocation. However, critical challenges remain regarding governance, equity, and implementation. Further research is needed to evaluate AI interventions in diverse contexts and establish sustainable pathways for adoption by governmental public health agencies.

Indexed as

Artificial IntelligenceCOVID-19Decision MakingPolicy MakingPoliticsPublic HealthHumansSARS-CoV-2AICOVID - 19elected officialsgovernmentpublic health decision makingpublic health emergencies (PHE)

Identifiers

PMID41853148
PMCPMC12992293

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.