ArticleFrontiers in public health2026
Low-value medical orders: bridging the gap between concept and action in reducing healthcare waste.
Article in Frontiers in public health, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- Total factor productivity growth and spatial-temporal evolution of China's health system: a three-stage DEA-Malmquist approach.Frontiers in public health · 2026Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Healthcare systems worldwide face the dual challenge of improving quality while controlling costs. Value-based healthcare has emerged as a guiding framework, yet a substantial proportion of delivered services remain low-value, providing minimal benefit while consuming resources and potentially causing harm. While low-value care has been extensively studied at the service level, less attention has been paid to the fundamental unit that initiates all healthcare delivery: the medical order. This commentary introduces the concept of low-value medical orders (LVMO) as a complementary framework to existing low-value care paradigms. By focusing on the point of clinical decision-making, LVMO offers a more actionable target for real-time intervention. We distinguish LVMO from low-value care across multiple dimensions and discuss how this framework can inform multilevel strategies combining clinician-focused interventions with broader system reforms. Drawing on recent systematic reviews of de-implementation interventions, we identify critical research gaps and propose directions for developing effective, sustainable approaches to reduce unnecessary ordering.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.