ArticleSSM. Qualitative research in health2022
An exploration of the needs and experiences of informal caregivers for Black breast cancer patients.
Article in SSM. Qualitative research in health, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 4 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
4 citing papers in PubMed.
- Stress and coping experiences of Black family cancer caregivers: a qualitative investigation.Supportive care in cancer : official journal of the Multinational Association of Supportive Care in Cancer · 2026Article
- Supporting Black breast cancer survivors and their informal caregivers: a qualitative dyadic analysis of intervention preferences.Annals of behavioral medicine : a publication of the Society of Behavioral Medicine · 2026Article
- Insights About Dyadic Cancer Survivorship Interventions for Black Women and Their Caregivers: A Rapid Qualitative Analysis of Collaborator Perspectives.Cancer control : journal of the Moffitt Cancer CenterArticle
- Longitudinal Dyadic Analysis of Psychosocial and Health Outcomes in Black Breast Cancer Patients and Their Informal Caregivers.Cancer control : journal of the Moffitt Cancer CenterArticle
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
7 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Introduction: Informal caregivers such as spouses, family members, and friends provide important support to breast cancer patients, but caregivers themselves often need support as well. We interviewed caregivers for Black breast cancer patients to understand caregiver experiences, perspectives on patient/caregiver resources, experiences of racism/discrimination during the patient's cancer treatment, and reactions to a sample survivorship care plan. Methods: Focus groups and interviews were conducted with 24 caregivers in a Midwestern U.S. metropolitan area. In this directed thematic analysis, a form of content analysis, recordings were transcribed and coded using deductively and inductively derived codes. The study team developed and refined the themes. Results: All caregivers self-identified as Black/African American. Most were female (79%) and a family member other than spouse/partner (63%). Themes included inconsistent knowledge of and access to resources for patients and caregivers; facing racism or other discrimination during the patient's treatment; positive reactions to survivorship care plans, as well as suggestions for improvement; and desiring empathy, flexibility, and fun when it came to caregiver resources, especially resources for Black caregivers. Discussion: Systematic screening and referral for caregivers may help social workers, nurse navigators, and other members of the health care team identify and address caregivers' needs, especially given many caregivers' tendency to focus on the patient. Caregiver-specific resources should be flexible and acknowledge the range of relationships caregivers have with patients. Multilevel interventions to address racism and other forms of discrimination may provide benefits both within the context of cancer care and as well as in broader settings.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.