ArticlePhysics and imaging in radiation oncology2026
Treatment planning for lung cancer reirradiation accounting for previously delivered dose.
Article in Physics and imaging in radiation oncology, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
12 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Reirradiation is increasingly used for recurrent and new primary cancers, but dedicated planning tools are limited. We integrated deformable image registration and radiobiologically consistent dose accumulation into plan optimisation to improve plan quality and robustness, applying this approach to six lung cancer cases and comparing it with a manual, maximum point-dose method. The integrated automated approach delivered higher target doses within organ-at-risk limits, maintained robustness, and was qualitatively preferable in blinded comparison. It produced clinically acceptable dose distributions for 5/6 patients, versus 3/6 with the manual method, suggesting enhanced and potentially more efficient reirradiation planning.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.