ReviewDrug design, development and therapy2026
Artificial Intelligence as a Disruptive Force in Pharmaceutical Innovation: Transforming Discovery, Development, and Manufacturing.
Review in Drug design, development and therapy, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.
- Sustainable smart sensing and AI-driven platforms for real-time detection and monitoring of mycotoxins across the food supply chain.Mycotoxin research · 2026Pooled it
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Artificial Intelligence (AI) is increasingly being implemented in pharmaceutical sciences and has the potential to improve efficiency across the value chain, from drug candidate discovery to manufacturing, quality monitoring, and regulatory process support. Nonetheless, the integration of AI within the pharmaceutical sector encounters persistent obstacles, such as data interoperability and fragmentation, the necessity for model validation and governance to satisfy compliance standards, the potential for bias and accountability concerns, and deficiencies in workforce skills. This review consolidates significant advancements in AI applications, such as generative AI, laboratory automation, and the digital twin concept, highlighting that effective implementation relies on workflow integration, data quality and integrity, and sufficient human-in-the-loop mechanisms. We propose strategic recommendations centred on human resource readiness, governance structures, and technology maturity assessment to assist readers in differentiating feasible solutions from aspirational frameworks. Moving forward, research and adoption will likely highlight precision medicine and regulatory-industry collaboration mechanisms for AI evaluation. The integration of AI with supporting technologies such as tamper-evident provenance/audit layers (such as blockchain) remains exploratory and generally limited to pilots.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.