Evidence map›Paper›PMID 41853089›Full record

ArticleContemporary clinical trials communications2026

Rural targeted messaging, multiplex salivary measurement, and rural equity in SARS-CoV-2 antibody testing: Protocol overview of a SeroNet investigation.

Leah Maschino, Kelly A Hirko, Christopher D Heaney, Douglas A Granger, Steve W Granger, Anurag Dawadi, Lindsey Rose, Monicia Summers, Nora Pisanic, Olivia Aspiras and 2 more

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Contemporary clinical trials communications, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

12 authors.

Leah MaschinoCharles Stewart Mott Department of Public Health, College of Human Medicine, Michigan State University, Flint, MI, USA.
Kelly A HirkoDepartment of Epidemiology and Biostatistics, College of Human Medicine, Michigan State University, Traverse City, MI, USA.
Christopher D HeaneyDepartment of Environmental Health and Engineering, Bloomberg School of Public Health, Johns Hopkins University, Baltimore, MD, USA.
Douglas A GrangerSalimetrics LLC, Carlsbad, CA, USA.
Steve W GrangerSalimetrics LLC, Carlsbad, CA, USA.
Anurag DawadiCharles Stewart Mott Department of Public Health, College of Human Medicine, Michigan State University, Flint, MI, USA.
Lindsey RoseCharles Stewart Mott Department of Public Health, College of Human Medicine, Michigan State University, Flint, MI, USA.
Monicia SummersCharles Stewart Mott Department of Public Health, College of Human Medicine, Michigan State University, Flint, MI, USA.
Nora PisanicDepartment of Environmental Health and Engineering, Bloomberg School of Public Health, Johns Hopkins University, Baltimore, MD, USA.
Olivia AspirasCharles Stewart Mott Department of Public Health, College of Human Medicine, Michigan State University, Flint, MI, USA.
Stefan M M GoetzCharles Stewart Mott Department of Public Health, College of Human Medicine, Michigan State University, Flint, MI, USA.
Todd LucasCharles Stewart Mott Department of Public Health, College of Human Medicine, Michigan State University, Flint, MI, USA.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Background: Rural communities were disproportionately impacted by the COVID-19 pandemic. Current and future pandemic preparedness in rural areas could be aided by serological (antibody) testing. However, benefits to be gained from serosurveillance are challenged both by the accessibility of serological testing resources in hard-to-reach rural areas, and by likely hesitancy towards their use in many rural communities. Trials are needed to evaluate outreach and health communication strategies that can increase rural receptivity towards serosurveillance. Methods: We conducted a two-arm randomized controlled trial that recruited N = 194 participants from rural northern Michigan. In a single online session lasting approximately 45 min, participants were randomly assigned to view either a general SARS-CoV-2 antibody testing didactic video, or a rural targeted didactic video co-created with a rural community advisory board and containing unique rural messaging. Primary self-report outcomes included receptivity to antibody testing, as well as activation of medical mistrust and concern for rural-discrimination in future SARS-CoV-2 antibody testing. We also developed and provided an opportunity to participate in a home-based salivary antibody screening program. In addition to assessing the feasibility and fidelity of this program, we assessed interest and full participation in the serosurveillance program as behavioral outcomes. Discussion: Findings from this study can guide the use of home-based screening programs and targeted health communication strategies to promote greater uptake of health resources in rural communities. In doing so, study results can also guide public health strategies to reduce pandemic-related and other rural health disparities.

Indexed as

Antibody testingCOVID-19Health communicationMedical mistrustRural health disparitiesSARS-CoV-2SeroNet

Identifiers

PMID41853089
PMCPMC12993416

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.