Evidence map›Paper›PMID 41853072›Full record

ArticleFrontiers in psychiatry2026

The somatization of structural friction: deciphering the surge of adolescent self-harm in post-transition China.

Wen-Jing Yan, Qian-Nan Ruan, Dongwu Xu

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Frontiers in psychiatry, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors.

Wen-Jing YanSchool of Mental Health, Wenzhou Medical University, Wenzhou, China.
Qian-Nan RuanWenzhou Depression Specialty Center, Wenzhou Seventh People's Hospital, Wenzhou, China.
Dongwu XuSchool of Mental Health, Wenzhou Medical University, Wenzhou, China.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

In the third decade of the 21st century, the mental health landscape of Chinese adolescence has undergone a profound and disturbing transformation. The dominant clinical idiom of distress has shifted from the passive, fatigue-based somatic complaints of "neurasthenia" (shenjing shuairuo) common in the late 20th century, to active, tissue-damaging behaviors, specifically non-suicidal self-injury (NSSI). Recent epidemiological data indicates that NSSI prevalence among Chinese adolescents has risen to levels significantly exceeding global averages, signaling a unique public health crisis that defies standard psychiatric categorization. This perspective article proposes that this surge cannot be adequately explained solely by individual pathology or biological vulnerability. Instead, we suggest it may be more productively understood through the lens of "Structural Friction", the grinding interface between macro-societal stagnation (characterized by neijuan or involution), high-control family dynamics, and the disembodied nature of digital existence. We propose the "Reverse Somatic Anchoring" model to explain the functional mechanism of NSSI in this specific cultural context. Unlike traditional somatization, where the body passively reflects distress, Reverse Somatic Anchoring suggests that adolescents utilize pain to actively "anchor" a drifting self back into biological reality amidst a crisis of ontological erasure. This article analyzes the tripartite engines of this friction, namely socioeconomic, familial, and technological, and argues that effective intervention requires moving beyond symptom management to address the somatic and structural roots of the crisis.

Indexed as

mental health in Chinaneijuan (involution)non-suicidal self-injury (NSSI)reverse somatic anchoringstructural friction

Identifiers

PMID41853072
PMCPMC12992251

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.