ArticleNeurobiology of stress2026
Central medial and paraventricular thalamic afferents to the orbitofrontal cortex have differential effects on reversal learning.
Article in Neurobiology of stress, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Cognitive impairments are prominent in stress-related psychiatric disorders, such as depression and PTSD. While current therapies may improve mood symptoms, many patients experience persistent deficits in cognitive flexibility. One form of cognitive flexibility disrupted in such conditions is reversal learning, dependent on the orbitofrontal cortex (OFC). Chronic stress causes OFC dysfunction and reversal learning deficits. However, the circuit mechanisms by which this happens are not understood. We hypothesized that two thalamic afferents to the OFC, the central medial (CM) and paraventricular thalamus (PVT), contribute to successful reversal learning and the detrimental effects of stress, respectively. We showed a decrease in activation of lateral OFC, measured by Fos induction, following reversal learning, and increased activation of both CM and PVT. Chronic unpredictable stress (CUS) impaired reversal learning and increased ΔFosB expression in CM and PVT projections to the OFC. Next, we chemogenetically manipulated each pathway to the OFC in non-stressed and stressed rats. Inhibition of the CM to OFC pathway in non-stressed rats disrupted reversal learning, while activation of this pathway restored reversal learning in stressed rats. By contrast, activation of the PVT to OFC pathway disrupted reversal learning in non-stressed male rats. In stressed males, inhibition of the PVT to OFC pathway ameliorated the detrimental effects of CUS. Effects of PVT to OFC manipulations were absent in females. These results indicate that the CM-OFC pathway promotes successful reversal learning in both sexes, and the PVT-OFC pathway contributes to the detrimental effects of stress on reversal learning in a sex-dependent manner.
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.