Evidence map›Paper›PMID 41853061›Full record

ReviewBreathe (Sheffield, England)2026

Pulmonary mycoses: a clinical perspective.

Klara Verstappen, Cédric Bosteels, Eva Van Braeckel

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Breathe (Sheffield, England), 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors.

Klara VerstappenDepartment of Respiratory Medicine, Ghent University Hospital, Ghent, Belgium.
Cédric BosteelsDepartment of Respiratory Medicine, Ghent University Hospital, Ghent, Belgium.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0003-3230-0879
Eva Van BraeckelDepartment of Respiratory Medicine, Ghent University Hospital, Ghent, Belgium.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-7242-0747

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Pulmonary mycoses encompass a broad spectrum of pathogens, including filamentous moulds, dimorphic fungi and fungi with predominantly yeast-like growth forms. Susceptibility is driven by defects in T-helper (Th)1/Th17 immunity, neutrophil dysfunction and barrier disruption. Clinical presentation varies widely, ranging from asymptomatic colonisation to rapidly progressive, life-threatening disease, depending on host immune status and pathogen type. Radiological findings, particularly on high-resolution computed tomography, often provide critical diagnostic clues but are rarely pathognomonic. Although histopathological evidence remains the gold standard, advancements in complementary diagnostics are increasingly being integrated into clinical workflows. Broad-range fungal markers such as (1→3)-β-d-glucan can guide diagnosis, while both culture- and nonculture-based tests are warranted for further pathogen identification, each offering unique advantages and constraints. Management emphasises prompt, guideline-concordant therapy. Emerging antifungal agents and host-directed immunotherapeutic approaches offer promise against resistant or refractory disease. This review synthesises current knowledge on species-specific epidemiology, clinical manifestations, radiological features, diagnostic methods and therapeutic options for pulmonary mycoses, highlighting practical considerations for clinicians managing these complex diseases.

Identifiers

PMID41853061
PMCPMC12993748

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.