Evidence map›Paper›PMID 41853060›Full record

ReviewBreathe (Sheffield, England)2026

Bronchoscopic endobronchial valves.

Tugba Cosgun, Halit Yardimci, Çağatay Tezel

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Breathe (Sheffield, England), 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors.

Tugba CosgunSisli Memorial Thoracic Surgery, Department of Thoracic Surgery, Halic University Medical Faculty, Beyoğlu, Turkey.
Halit YardimciDepartment of Thoracic Surgery, Marmara University Medical Faculty, Istanbul, Turkey.
Çağatay TezelSisli Memorial Thoracic Surgery, Department of Thoracic Surgery, Halic University Medical Faculty, Beyoğlu, Turkey.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Bronchoscopic endobronchial valves (EBVs) have emerged as a minimally invasive alternative to surgical lung volume reduction for patients with severe emphysema. Emphysema, a progressive lung disease associated with COPD, leads to hyperinflation of the affected lung and reduces respiratory efficiency. EBVs function by limiting airflow to diseased lung segments, causing atelectasis of the emphysematous lung, and allowing healthier lung regions to expand, thereby improving overall pulmonary function. Two primary EBV systems, Zephyr and Spiration valves, have demonstrated efficacy in clinical trials. The Zephyr valve has been associated with improved forced expiratory volume in 1 s, 6-min walk distance and quality-of-life metrics in patients with heterogeneous emphysema. Similarly, the Spiration Valve System has shown promising results, including sustained pulmonary function improvements and symptom relief. The success of EBV therapy depends on careful patient selection, including assessment of interlobar fissure integrity and collateral ventilation using imaging techniques and the Chartis system. Common complications include pneumothorax, valve migration and airway infections, necessitating careful monitoring and follow-up. Ongoing research aims to optimise patient selection, refine procedural techniques and investigate adjunct therapies. As evidence supporting EBVs continues to grow, these devices hold significant potential for improving the quality of life in patients with severe emphysema who are not candidates for surgical intervention.

Identifiers

PMID41853060
PMCPMC12993746

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.