ReviewBreathe (Sheffield, England)2026
What is new in pleural infections?
Review in Breathe (Sheffield, England), 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
7 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
The field of pleural medicine has seen significant advances in recent years, shaping both the current and future evaluation and treatment of pleural infection. Recent studies have demonstrated a continued rise in the prevalence of pleural infection and provide a more refined understanding of the risk factors associated with its occurrence. The increased use of point-of-care ultrasound and the identification of computed tomography markers have enhanced and expedited initial evaluation. Novel microbiological techniques are expanding our understanding of the diversity of causative pathogens and disease mechanisms, with potential implications for diagnostic strategies and antibiotic selection. Emerging studies are also exploring the feasibility of shorter courses of antibiotics. Meanwhile, novel blood and pleural fluid biomarkers are being increasingly studied for both diagnosis and prognostication. Furthermore, accumulating evidence on risk stratification is increasingly being published and used in clinical settings. The specific role, optimal sequence and patient selection for intrapleural enzyme therapy, surgery, and medical thoracoscopy is enabling a more personalised approach to treatment and may improve patient outcomes. These and other developments are discussed in this review, which presents a state-of-the-art overview of pleural infection management from the clinician's perspective, highlighting recent and anticipated advances.
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.