Evidence map›Paper›PMID 41853048›Full record

ReviewSurgery open science2026

Surgery as a greedy job: The valorization of the worker's professionalism for women in surgery.

Maria Irene Bellini, Pasquale Passalacqua

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Surgery open science, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

2 authors.

Maria Irene BelliniDepartment of Surgery, Sapienza University, Rome, Italy.
Pasquale PassalacquaDepartment of Law, Tor Vergata University, Rome, Italy.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Introduction: Greedy job is referred to a condition in which companies and/or institutions require employees to work beyond agreed-upon working hours or beyond agreed standards. With the current shortage of surgeons and increased number of women entering a surgical career, it is fundamental to consider their needs, distress, and motivation factors to implement the surgical workforce. Methods: A systematic search was performed to review literature addressing working hours disrespect and greedy jobs in surgery, aiming to report the current evidence with regards to the different impact on general surgeons. Results: Greedy job in surgery is common and its consequences are predominantly affecting female gender and younger generation. Prolonged working hours were associated with burnout incidence, reduced time for research and eventually jeopardizing education. Furthermore, job satisfaction, earning and career progression discrepancy between genders, as well as the risk for health and wellness with secondary effects on parenthood and childcare were predominantly hindering women surgeons. Conclusions: Sustainable and flexible working hours could represent a valuable opportunity to attract future generations into surgery. This is particularly important for the recruitment of women, who historically have more frequently faced the negative consequences of greedy jobs. Technology might be in the future of aid to overcome space and time constraints, always with the goal to protect rest time, personal life, and mental and physical health, from a perspective we might call "anti-greed".

Indexed as

DiscriminationGreedy jobSurgeryWomen in surgery

Identifiers

PMID41853048
PMCPMC12993389

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.