ArticleJournal of pharmacy & bioallied sciences2026
A Hospital-Based Cross-Sectional Study on the Suboptimal Use of Eye Protective Devices (EPDs) Among Blue-Collar Professionals in India.
Article in Journal of pharmacy & bioallied sciences, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Background: Ocular injuries, especially corneal foreign bodies (CFBs), are common among blue-collar professionals in India due to the insufficient use of protective eye equipment. This study aimed to the investigate the incidence and causes of suboptimal Eye Protective Device (EPD) usage. Methods: A cross-sectional study was conducted at a tertiary hospital from January to June 2024, including 102 patients with occupational CFBs. A structured questionnaire assessed demographics, occupational exposure, EPD usage, and awareness levels. Results: The mean age was 37.97 years. Welding (38.23%) and metal grinding (31.37%) were the leading causes of injury. Only 27.45% regularly used EPDs, 17.64% used them occasionally, and 54.90% never used them. Reasons for non-usage included lack of regulations (60.78%), unawareness (17.64%), and financial constraints (15.68%). Notably, 35.29% had previously attempted foreign body removal themselves. Despite 80.39% being aware of EPDs, usage remained low. Conclusion: There is a significant gap between awareness and practice regarding EPD usage. Enforcement of workplace safety laws and provision of affordable EPDs are essential to prevent CFBs and related complications.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.