ArticleJournal of pharmacy & bioallied sciences2026
Assessment of Knowledge and Attitude Among Healthcare Workers Regarding Emergency Codes at a NABH-Accredited Hospital in Pune.
Article in Journal of pharmacy & bioallied sciences, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
7 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Introduction: Emergency codes are crucial for managing hospital crises, and the knowledge and attitude of healthcare workers significantly influence response efficacy. Drills and training enhance preparedness. The aim of the study was to assess the knowledge and attitude of healthcare workers toward emergency codes in a NABH-accredited hospital in Pune. Materials and Methods: A cross-sectional study was conducted in a 120-bedded orthopedic specialty hospital in Pune. Data were collected via Google Forms from 167 participants, including doctors, nurses, technicians, and administrative staff. Knowledge was assessed through 15 multiple-choice questions, and attitude via 10 agree/disagree items. Chi-square tests were used for analysis. Results: Participants included 16 (9.6%) doctors, 55 (32.9%) nurses, 28 (16.8%) technicians, and 68 (40.7%) administrative staff. Administrative staff showed the highest knowledge (71%), followed by nurses (70%), technicians (69%), and doctors (63%). Differences were significant (χ² = 29.53, Conclusion: Knowledge and attitudes were generally good but varied by code and profession. Recommendations include regular training, mock drills, and guideline updates to improve preparedness.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.