ArticleJournal of pharmacy & bioallied sciences2026
Medical Law in Dentistry and OMFS: KAP Study.
Article in Journal of pharmacy & bioallied sciences, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
7 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Background: With the increasing medico-legal challenges in clinical practice, dental and oral and maxillofacial surgeons must be well-versed in legal protocols. This study aimed to assess the knowledge, attitude, and practice (KAP) regarding medical law among dental professionals across India. Materials and Methods: A cross-sectional questionnaire-based survey was conducted among 2,581 dental and oral and maxillofacial surgical (OMFS) practitioners from various Indian states. The validated tool assessed legal knowledge, attitudes toward medico-legal importance, and routine practices like informed consent and record-keeping. Data were analyzed using descriptive statistics and Chi-square tests with significance set at Results: A total of 57.76% reported basic knowledge of medical law, while 64.04% were aware of informed consent laws. Although 72.75% strongly agreed that understanding medical law is essential, only 52.49% expressed strong confidence in managing medico-legal scenarios. Routine consent and documentation were practiced by 71.01% and 69.19% of respondents, respectively. Regional participation was highest from Karnataka, Madhya Pradesh, and Andhra Pradesh. Conclusion: While awareness and attitude toward medical law are promising, practical implementation remains suboptimal. Strengthening medico-legal training in dental education and continued professional development is crucial for ethical and legally sound practice.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.