Evidence map›Paper›PMID 41853003›Full record

ReviewJournal of pharmacy & bioallied sciences2026

Neuroprotectants: The Next Frontier in Neurology.

Patel Khushi, Nisha Jayantilal Parmar, Rahul Daga, Jyotsna Sethumadhavan, Pallavi Kamlesh Kale, Rashmi Laddha

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Journal of pharmacy & bioallied sciences, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
1citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

1 citing paper in PubMed.

  1. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors.

Patel KhushiDepartment of Internal Medicine, Surat Medical Institute of Medicine and Research (SMIMER), Surat, Gujarat, India.
Nisha Jayantilal ParmarDepartment of Pathology, Dr. N D Desai Faculty of Medical Science and Research, Dharmsinh Desai University, Nadiad, Gujarat, India.
Rahul DagaDepartment of Anesthesia, SMRCH, Nagpur, Maharashtra, India.
Jyotsna SethumadhavanDepartment of Prosthodontics and Crown and Bridge, Bharati Vidyapeeth (Deemed to be University) Dental College and Hospital, Navi Mumbai, Maharashtra, India.
Pallavi Kamlesh KaleDepartment of Prosthodontics and Crown and Bridge, Bharati Vidyapeeth (Deemed to be University) Dental College and Hospital, Navi Mumbai, Maharashtra, India.
Rashmi LaddhaDepartment of Periodontology, DR Rajesh Ramdasji Kambe Dental College and Hospital, Akola, Maharashtra, India.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Neuroprotectants are drugs or substances that help protect the brain and nerves from damage caused by injuries or diseases like stroke, Alzheimer's disease, and Parkinson's disease. This review looks at different types of neuroprotective agents, including those that reduce inflammation, prevent cell death, or improve blood flow to the brain. While many of these substances show good results in lab studies, only a few have been successful in human trials. This is often due to problems like delayed treatment, difficulty reaching the brain, and differences between patients. The review also discusses future clinical trials and how new technologies and targeted treatments may improve outcomes. Understanding how these agents work and how to test them better could lead to more effective treatments for brain disorders.

Indexed as

Alzheimer’s diseasebrain injuryclinical researchfuture trialsnerve protectionneuroprotectantsstroke

Identifiers

PMID41853003
PMCPMC12995163

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.