Evidence map›Paper›PMID 41852945›Full record

ArticleCurrent research in food science2026

Detection and identification of insect processed animal proteins in microscopic images using deep learning.

Cyril Kaisin, Pascal Veys, Abigaël Anselmo, Bernard Gosselin

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Current research in food science, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors.

Cyril KaisinISIA Lab, Faculty of Engineering, University of Mons, Boulevard Dolez 31, Mons, 7000, Belgium.
Pascal VeysKnowledge and Valorisation of agricultural Products Department, Walloon Agricultural Research Centre, Chaussée de Namur 24, Gembloux, 5030, Belgium.
Abigaël AnselmoKnowledge and Valorisation of agricultural Products Department, Walloon Agricultural Research Centre, Chaussée de Namur 24, Gembloux, 5030, Belgium.
Bernard GosselinISIA Lab, Faculty of Engineering, University of Mons, Boulevard Dolez 31, Mons, 7000, Belgium.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The introduction of terrestrial invertebrate processed animal proteins (PAPs) from insects in animal feed has introduced challenges for official controls in the European Union. Currently, their detection relies only on light microscopy and is entirely dependent on the expertise of trained operators. Recent studies have highlighted two primary problems regarding insect PAP detection: specificity issues due to the misidentification of non-insect structures as insect derived ones, and the difficulty in categorizing a wide morphological diversity of particles resulting from the grinding of whole insect larvae. To address these limitations, a proof of concept was developed involving automated microscopic image analysis and classification by deep learning. A classification pipeline integrating a YOLO object detection model with an improved ConvNeXt architecture coupled with transformer blocks was tested. After supervised learning, training and validation of the model, obtained results allowed to successfully distinguish insect particles from other non-insect materials, and to discriminate PAPs particles derived from

Indexed as

Deep learningFeedInsect mealMicroscopyProcessed animal proteins

Identifiers

PMID41852945
PMCPMC12992973

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.