ArticleImaging neuroscience (Cambridge, Mass.)
Encoding neural representations of time-continuous stimulus-response transformations in the human brain with advanced deep neural networks.
Article in Imaging neuroscience (Cambridge, Mass.). The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
2 citing papers in PubMed.
- A 5.0 T Ultra-High-Field fMRI Dataset for Naturalistic Visual Scene Processing.Scientific data · 2026Article
- Beyond the dichotomy between controlled and naturalistic paradigms: modeling psychological constructs in cognitive neuroscience.Frontiers in psychology · 2026Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Human behavior arises from the continuous transformation of sensory input into goal-directed actions. While existing analytical methods often break time into discrete events, the stages and underlying representations involved in stimulus-response (S-R) transformations within time-continuous, complex environments remain incompletely understood. Encoding models, combined with deep neural networks (DNNs) for feature generation, offer a promising framework for capturing these neural processes. While DNNs continue to improve in performance, it remains unclear whether these advances translate into closer alignment with human cognitive mechanisms. To address this, we collected fMRI data from participants (N = 23) as they played arcad video games and used DNN-based encoding models to predict human brain activity. We compared the prediction accuracy of features from three DNNs at different stages of development within our encoding model. The results show that the most advanced DNN provides the most predictive feature space for neural responses, while also revealing a closer hierarchical alignment between its internal representations and the brain's functional organization. These results enable a more fine-grained characterization of time-continuous S-R transformations in high-dimensional visuomotor tasks, progressing along the dorsal visual stream and extending into motor-related regions. This approach highlights the potential of machine learning to advance cognitive neuroscience by enhancing the investigation of ecological valid experimental tasks.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.