ArticleImaging neuroscience (Cambridge, Mass.)
Resilience-related neural similarity during naturalistic movie watching.
Article in Imaging neuroscience (Cambridge, Mass.). The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- Inter-subject correlations and their behavioral associations vary across movies: Implications for generalizability.bioRxiv : the preprint server for biology · 2026Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Psychological resilience protects individuals against the negative consequences of exposure to adversity. Despite increasing attention given to resilience for its role in maintaining mental health, a clear conceptualization of resilience remains elusive, and the intricacies of its neural correlates are poorly understood. Here, we recorded brain activity in healthy young adults using a 7T MRI scanner while they naturally watched two movie clips, one with neutral content and another with negative content. Stronger and more extensive neural similarity, as estimated by inter-subject correlation, was observed in response to the negative movie compared with the neutral movie. Moreover, we found that high-resilience individuals had similar neural activities to their peers, while low-resilience individuals showed more variable neural activities. A secondary analysis examined the relationship between ISCs and an additional self-report behavioral measure of interest, Intolerance of Uncertainty (IU). IU is a personality trait known to bias perception and cognition and has been proposed to be related to resilience. We found that higher IU was associated with attenuated resilience-related neural similarity in attention-related brain regions, suggesting that IU may undermine resilience by altering attentional focus toward specific aspects of the external environment. We propose that the similarity of neural responses among resilient individuals highlights adaptive emotional processing engaging multiple brain systems. Conversely, the variability in neural responses among low-resilience groups indicates vulnerability to adverse psychological outcomes. These insights shed light on the mechanisms of resilience, highlighting that it involves a constellation of neuropsychological processes crucial for adapting to external stimuli.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.