ArticleThe journal of allergy and clinical immunology. Global2026
Validity of PEN-FAST as a clinical decision tool in pregnant patients.
Article in The journal of allergy and clinical immunology. Global, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
8 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Background: Reported penicillin allergies are associated with adverse patient outcomes, particularly in high-risk patient states such as pregnancy. The PEN-FAST clinical decision-making tool has previously been validated in general populations to identify individuals at low risk for penicillin allergy. Objective: We aimed to validate PEN-FAST in risk-stratifying-reported penicillin allergies in pregnant patients to enhance delabeling. Methods: Between September 2020 and June 2023, pregnant patients with reported penicillin allergies underwent allergy evaluation in Yale New Haven Hospital-affiliated allergy and immunology clinics. We retrospectively calculated PEN-FAST scores of pregnant patients who had undergone skin testing and/or oral challenge. Sensitivity, specificity, positive predictive value, negative predicative value, area under the curve, and positive and negative likelihood ratio were calculated for each PEN-FAST score (0-5). Results: Penicillin allergy testing was performed on 334 patients with a mean age of 32.2 plus or minus 4.6 years and a mean gestational age of 31.7 plus or minus 4.7 weeks (range 16.4-39.3 weeks). A total of 326 patients underwent oral challenge. All passed the testing and were delabeled. A PEN-FAST cutoff of 2 or lower showed a specificity of 93.1% (95% CI = 89.8-95.6) and a negative predictive value of 99.7 (95% CI = 98.2-100.0). Conclusion: PEN-FAST can be used to improve risk stratification of reported penicillin allergies among pregnant patients, enhancing delabeling in this population. Our data also support the idea that skin testing and oral challenge are well tolerated at a wide range of gestational ages as young as 16 weeks. In our large cohort of more than 300 pregnant patients, the majority were low-risk and all who underwent oral challenge passed without any severe adverse events.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.