ArticleThe journal of allergy and clinical immunology. Global2026
Neutrophils have altered response to acute respiratory viral infection in sputum of patients with rheumatoid arthritis.
Article in The journal of allergy and clinical immunology. Global, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
13 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Background: Rheumatoid arthritis (RA) has been shown to pathologically modify the human lung environment. Individuals with RA have been shown to have higher incidence of respiratory infections and worse resultant patient outcomes. Objective: We investigated whether single-cell transcriptional signals within sputum distinguished healthy lungs from those of patients with RA before and after infection. Methods: Sputum samples were collected at both baseline (study enrollment) and 1 month following respiratory infection. Expectorated sputum was fixed at time of sampling and sequenced via a 10 Results: A total of 5 female donors (2 healthy and 3 with RA) were included. A mean of 5,773 cells per donor were captured, resulting in a total of 23,094 high-quality cells included in this study. The samples comprised 5 major cell types: 2 distinct macrophage populations, a neutrophil population, and minor populations of both B and T cells. There were no statistically significant differences in proportion of cell types between samples from healthy donors and those from patients with RA or between baseline and postinfection timepoints. However, gene modules of significantly differentially expressed genes between groups revealed transcriptional differences between groups that were associated with neutrophil function, including NETosis and inflammatory responses. Conclusion: Immune cell proportions in donors with RA and in healthy donors are similar both before and after infection. However, transcriptional differences within lung neutrophils persist up to 30 days following respiratory infection.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.