Evidence map›Paper›PMID 41852799›Full record

ArticleHealth affairs scholar2026

What do we really know about addressing burnout among healthcare workers? Maybe less than we think.

Ron Z Goetzel, Louis E Fazen, Karen B Kent, Enid C Roemer, Ian J Saldanha

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Health affairs scholar, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors.

Ron Z GoetzelInstitute for Health and Productivity Studies, Johns Hopkins Bloomberg School of Public Health, Baltimore, MD 21205, United States.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0003-4989-4108
Louis E FazenDepartment of Environmental Health and Engineering, Johns Hopkins Bloomberg School of Public Health, Baltimore, MD 21205, United States.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-3154-6829
Karen B KentInstitute for Health and Productivity Studies, Johns Hopkins Bloomberg School of Public Health, Baltimore, MD 21205, United States.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0001-7500-9446
Enid C RoemerInstitute for Health and Productivity Studies, Johns Hopkins Bloomberg School of Public Health, Baltimore, MD 21205, United States.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-7821-8144
Ian J SaldanhaDepartment of Epidemiology, Johns Hopkins Bloomberg School of Public Health, Baltimore, MD 21205, United States.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-2062-3382

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

This policy inquiry responds to the question: Are commonly held assumptions about how to address healthcare workers' burnout truly evidence-based? We think not. Our conclusion is informed by findings from a recently completed large systematic review commissioned by the Agency for Healthcare Research and Quality. We highlight significant gaps in research regarding effective interventions directed at healthcare worker burnout. We include findings related to social support initiatives where limited credible evidence points to the potential for positive effects. We conclude that certainty about the effectiveness of intervention programs directed at burnout is elusive and there is a dire need for additional studies using rigorous methods given the healthcare worker shortage we now face.

Indexed as

burnouthealthcare workerssystematic review

Identifiers

PMID41852799
PMCPMC12993710

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.